DoubleVerify Breaks The Moat And Storms The Social Castle
What do Pepsi, Ulta Beauty and AB InBev have in common? A year ago, they were Moat clients. Now they’re in DoubleVerify’s camp.
What do Pepsi, Ulta Beauty and AB InBev have in common? A year ago, they were Moat clients. Now they’re in DoubleVerify’s camp.
Publishers and SSPs aren’t incentivized to accurately label their video inventory. But increased pressure from the buy side could correct the skewed pricing dynamics that result from outstream being sold as instream.
Media governance measures advertisers can put in place to navigate the complexity of brand safety and gain better control of the quality of their media spend.
Between 2019 and 2021, two-thirds of advertisers bought ads on sites flagged for repeatedly publishing false or misleading content, a recent study found.
Integral Ad Science had a decent Q1 – especially in comparison to its direct competitor, DoubleVerify. Even so, frustration with the opacity of third-party brand safety and ad verification providers is increasingly bubbling to the surface.
DoubleVerify reported its Q1 earnings on Tuesday and guess which topics didn’t come up, even once? The Forbes-run MFA subdomain, DV’s apparent misreporting of X’s brand safety rates and not a single tough question about measurement gaps.
Appealing to advertisers’ better angels is never going to bring ads back to the news. But appealing to their bottom lines might.
Industry experts weigh in on Forbes’s MFA subdomain and why ad verification tools still regularly fail to flag some instances of alleged SIVT.
Despite the backlash against MFA websites, there is still no industry standard to define MFA. So the 4A’s is hosting monthly meetings between buyers and sellers to nail down more explicit criteria for what constitutes MFA.
Coming off of a strong 2023, DoubleVerify is betting that its products for social media will fuel its revenue growth for years to come.