Home Ad Exchange News Monopsony Gets Its Day In Court; Why Theory-First Works In Theory

Monopsony Gets Its Day In Court; Why Theory-First Works In Theory

SHARE:
Comic: Privacy Theater

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Who Wants To Play Monopsony?

This week, a US judge blocked a merger between Penguin Random House and Simon & Schuster, two major publishing houses. 

You may ask, why is a print publishing merger relevant? 

Partly because it’s another example of legacy businesses merging because they can’t compete with the scale of Amazon, Google or Apple, only to be denied. Outbrain and Taboola were nixed because, apparently, how could anyone compete with that? Lol. 

The Kroger and Albertsons grocery merger will face antitrust review and fits the same mold. 

But the book publisher case is also notable because the Justice Department Antitrust Division won it on grounds of monopsony. (A monopoly is when one company owns the supply of a product, whereas monopsony is control over demand, such as Penguin Random House Simon Schuster controlling book distribution and contract prices for authors.)

The DOJ and FTC are revamping their merger enforcement standards this and next year, and emphasize they want to tackle more monopsony cases. Historically, monopolies are the main attraction for antitrust. 

Google and Amazon are monopsony targets, though, since they channel a high percent of online ad dollars, thus controlling demand in the space. 

Bandying Theories

It is not a new critique of soft-science or liberal arts academic research that professors tend to focus on abstract and theoretical questions. 

Even in marketing research, which is naturally more business-facing than, say, philosophy, the predominant research follows this progression: introduction → prior literature → overarching theoretical framework → hypotheses → empirical test → discussion. That’s the methodology behind “theory-first” research.

But a group of business school professors propose in the latest Journal of Marketing that academics shift to an “empirics-first” approach to marketing. (Check out their summary at the American Marketing Association blog.)

It sounds like a small change – theory to empirics. But it’s a big lift. 

“One possible reason is that TF research is well-represented in PhD education and uses a series of well-defined steps while EF research, which tends to be open-ended and unstructured, appears to lack rigor,” according to the authors. 

They suggest researchers begin not with a theoretical hypothesis but with a real-world issue or instance that can be broadened through empirical study. The research contribution (the attribution, if you will) should be tied to whether the research “advances understanding.” 

The Missing Link

The earnings dynamics for social media influencers often depend on the platform where they have the most engagement.

If you’re big on YouTube, you’re likely making real money from rev shares, either enough to get rich or run a steady, reliable business. If you’re hot on TikTok or Facebook and/or Instagram, you’re making incremental change with an occasional viral post that could pay off hundreds or thousands of dollars (though there’s also that second revenue stream, #sponcon). Twitter, Snapchat and Pinterest don’t signify, I’m sorry to say. 

But what about LinkedIn?

I agree. My first response is to laugh. 

But, apparently, the rise of the LinkedIn influencer who’s banking on their platform status is growing and is very lucrative, Vice reports. 

With content that’s about inspiring people enmeshed in the corporate hustle (cue the anecdote about vulnerability or humble brag), LinkedIn influencers sometimes even gain their status because of how roundly mocked they are by people on Twitter and Reddit, the article notes:

“The joke is perhaps on everyone else, as many of the same people getting ripped apart on Reddit have figured out a relatively easy way to earn hundreds of thousands of dollars by spouting inspirational, if often conventional, wisdom.” 

But Wait, There’s More!

How a TikTok creator’s fake Pepsi ad led to multiple brand partnerships. [Ad Age]

Marketers can’t stop chasing ‘authenticity,’ whatever that means. [Digiday]

A case for empirics-first approaches to academic marketing research. [AMA]

Integrating a Media Mix Model into a digital marketing workflow. [Mobile Dev Memo]

As Netflix dives into advertising, media buyers watch the clock. [Marketing Brew]

You’re Hired!

Mirriad names Karen Magnani VP of sales, US. [release]

Must Read

Benoit Vatere, chief media & digital commerce officer, Liquid Death

Murder Your Thirst And Measure Everything

Liquid Death is all jokes and dark humor on the surface, but the canned water brand’s chief media and digital commerce officer, Benoit Vatere, takes measurement deadly seriously. He’s tackling one of the gnarliest problems in CPG: proving that media actually moves product off the shelves.

The Trade Desk’s Revenue Growth Stalls As Big Brands Tighten Their Belts

“Our revenue growth is below our expectations and below the standard we hold ourselves to,” The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green told investors.

Comic: Measuremints

Nielsen Is Acquiring DoubleVerify For $2.15 Billion

On Thursday, Nielsen entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DoubleVerify in an all cash transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

WBD Hopes To Buoy Linear TV Long Enough For Streaming To Find Its Way

Warner Bros. Discovery cited softer ad sales growth and the continued decline of linear TV as its reasons for missing investor expectations in Q2. Unsurprisingly, streaming ads are the biggest bright spot on WBD’s earnings report card.

Comic: The Mobile Freight Train

AppLovin Asks For Patience As It Grows Its Ecommerce And Consumer Ads Business

“We’re deemed a new bucket, so a testing category,” AppLovin CEO told investors regarding its nascent consumer and ecommerce ads business. “And to graduate up takes time. This stuff compounds over quarters and years.”

Magnite Doesn’t Want To Be A DSP. It Just Wants To Own The Decisioning Layer

On Wednesday, Magnite CEO Michael Barrett painted a picture of a company that’s edging into the buy side by adding more DSP-style capabilities for planning and activation.