Home Daily News Roundup What The CMA Has To Say About The Privacy Sandbox; The Cookie’s Loss Is MMM’s Gain

What The CMA Has To Say About The Privacy Sandbox; The Cookie’s Loss Is MMM’s Gain

SHARE:
Comic: Stop Setting Money On Fire

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

The CMA Has Its Say

Google’s latest cookie deprecation delay had some industry watchers speculating that it was trying to preempt a negative assessment of its Privacy Sandbox cookie alternative from the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

Well, the CMA just released its latest report on the Privacy Sandbox rollout. And just as pundits predicted, it highlights several concerns over how the Sandbox might give Google an advantage over other ad tech platforms and digital publishers.

DPG Media’s Simon J. Harris outlined the CMA’s key takeaways in a thread on X. 

The CMA still needs assurance that Google won’t use the Sandbox to bolster its already dominant market position. And it’s examining whether Google should even be allowed to use its first-party data for targeting and measurement on its owned and operated sites.

The report also flagged steps Google has agreed to take to clarify concerns about the Sandbox’s Topics and Protected Audience APIs.

For Topics, Google will give users more transparency into how the API uses their data and will periodically reaffirm their consent for data usage.

For Protected Audiences, Google will update Chrome’s user interface to disclose how sites build targetable interest groups. Google will also address concerns that it is effectively mandating that publishers use Google Ad Manager as their ad server and top-level seller. Lastly, Google will ensure that the Sandbox’s fenced frames feature can support video and native ads.

Signals Of Change

In the meantime, marketers are turning to media mix modeling (MMM) and incrementality testing to help prepare for what will happen when cookies finally do disappear.

MMM is back in style among advertisers because it works when signal lacks, according to ad execs who gathered to talk about signal loss in New York City last week at an event hosted by TripleLift. 

The old-school attribution model attributes ad spend by channel over the course of weeks or sometimes months to help buyers assess return on ad spend even without cross-channel identifiers that help measure who saw the ads.

In addition to MMM, incrementality testing with alternative web identifiers is also “really important for many of our advertisers” to measure the impact of ad buys without cookies involved, said Marion Sayre, digital marketing director at Kepler, at the event.

But when it comes to incrementality testing, “do it smart,” Sayre advised. “Don’t take the next six months spending a ton of money running every [possible] test.” 

While alt IDs have plenty of potential, their scale is still too small, she said, and spending too much money testing them may just result in more ad repetition and wasted dollars.

Snap Snaps Back

Snap reported an impressive revenue turnaround in its Q1 2024 earnings on Thursday, writes Eric Seufert at Mobile Dev Memo.

Like other app-based social platforms, Snap’s ad business took a major hit when Apple introduced its AppTrackingTransparency (ATT) framework halfway through 2021. 

Prior to ATT, Snap reported 116% revenue growth in Q2 2021. That fell to 57% the following quarter, and declined steadily before bottoming out at -7% in Q1 2023.

But Snap returned to double-digit growth in Q1 this year, at 21%.

So how did Snap right the ship? Through investments in non mobile ID-based attribution.

Back in Q3 last year, Snap introduced a new feature that lets advertisers bid directly on attributed seven-day click-through conversions. In Q1, it expanded this feature to include app install and purchase events, which produced a 75% uptick in purchase-related conversions.

Snap also partnered with Snowflake to launch a new version of its Conversion API (CAPI), which led to a 300% increase in integrations.

These new attribution tools likely spurred increased performance for direct-response advertisers, Seufert writes. That led to an 85% increase in small- and mid-sized brands advertising on Snap in Q1 and a 17% increase in direct response revenue.

But Wait, There’s More!

Brian O’Kelly’s open letter to scandal-of-the-week-obsessed pundits on why digital advertising’s flaws never get fixed. [blog]

Tech spending remained a drag on agency holdco revenue in Q1. [WSJ]

G/O Media sells The Onion to a group of journalists and digital media execs. [Awful Announcing]

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.