Home Omnichannel InMarket Acquires MMM Startup ChannelMix (And Says Its Tech Is Up To Code After Settling With The FTC)

InMarket Acquires MMM Startup ChannelMix (And Says Its Tech Is Up To Code After Settling With The FTC)

SHARE:
Top view of man working using computer. Vector illustration of website design, development, programming, seo. Creative concept for web banner, social media banner, business presentation.

MTA is dead, long live MMM. And also vice versa.

Because there’s value in both approaches. They’re better when used together, said Todd Morris, CEO of location data and measurement company InMarket.

And Morris is willing to bet on that.

On Monday, InMarket acquired ChannelMix, a marketing analytics startup primarily focused on media mix modeling. Morris declined to share terms, but he said that all of ChannelMix’s 25 employees are coming on board, bringing InMarket’s total headcount to just under 340.

InMarket already has a multitouch attribution solution of its own, which brands can use to connect campaign performance to in-store sales and foot traffic. But this only paints a picture of what’s happening at the bottom of the funnel.

Brands also need to know how their media performs across channels to effectively calibrate their budgets. MMM is good for that, but historically it’s an expensive and slow process.

“Marketers are increasingly accountable, and that means they can’t wait weeks or months, which is what it can take – they need to know way more quickly,” Morris said.

MMM, but faster

ChannelMix will help InMarket zoom in or out, whether marketers want a long-term view across channels or a near-term view tied to sales.

Morris referred to this new capability as “marketing impact modeling.”

In partial translation from the jargon, it involves pulling in data from multiple sources via API and using an AI model to analyze historical trends and predict marketing performance by channel, audience segment and creative type.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“Instead of having an MMM provider and a separate MTA provider, marketers can have one source of data and consistent measures,” Morris said. “It doesn’t have to be an either/or, because these systems learn better as one.”

Advertisers can get recommendations within one to three days, which makes the insights more immediately actionable, he said. From there, they can optimize campaigns in flight rather than wait for a campaign to end before being able to measure it and see what worked.

According to Morris, the model is able to predict future campaign performance with 99% accuracy.

Which raises the question of how InMarket measures incrementality. It’s baked into the system, Morris said.

“A sale, a new user, traffic – whatever it is, marketers want to know whether it’s incremental to their business,” he said. “We consider that to be a fundamental part of this capability, not just tying media performance to existing sales but also helping drive incremental sales.”

In a good place

The acquisition of ChannelMix is InMarket’s fifth within as many years.

InMarket bought location tech company Thinknear in 2019 and two companies the following year: location data provider NinthDecimal and loyalty app Key Ring. It acquired shopping list app Out of Milk in 2021.

There’s a theme connecting these deals, including ChannelMix, which is to bridge the gap between digital media and physical commerce. The majority of purchases still happen in a store, Morris said.

Buying an MMM startup is another tool in the kit to help marketers improve performance of digital media by analyzing the totality of their spend, online and offline, he said.

But InMarket must tread carefully. It only recently finalized its settlement with the Federal Trade Commission in May after being accused of unlawfully collecting and using sensitive location data for advertising purposes without the proper permissions.

InMarket’s odyssey with the FTC first began four years ago, before Lina Khan was even sworn in as chair. The company has since invested millions of dollars into its privacy program. It’s been worth it, though, Morris said.

“The work we did with the FTC over four years has helped create a blueprint for the industry and provide clarity about consumer consent and sensitive locations,” he said.

Morris also noted that the settlement did not include a fine or damages (although it did call for InMarket to delete or otherwise destroy all previously collected location data for which it didn’t have consent, as well as any products developed using unconsented data).

“I’d say we’re in a privacy-forward position now,” Morris said. “It’s like we’ve been vetted by the FTC.”

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.