Home Daily News Roundup Privacy Sandbox Push And Pull; Standardize RMNs? They’re Practically From Different Planets

Privacy Sandbox Push And Pull; Standardize RMNs? They’re Practically From Different Planets

SHARE:
Comic: Unified ID 2.0

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Tough Cookies

Some industry observers (including AdExchanger) have deliberated on The Trade Desk’s apparent withdrawal from – and direct antagonism with – the Chrome Privacy Sandbox.

Bill Simmons, TTD’s VP of product, penned a column in December for The Current, which is The Trade Desk’s content marketing site, staking out a strong position against the Privacy Sandbox, alleging Google failed on its stated goal to create a workable alternative to third-party cookies. Oh, and advertisers and publishers should prioritize open industry ID initiatives – not a surprising POV for TTD.

Further, Simmons argued that Chrome’s alternatives may only prove workable for Google and a few other ad platforms that have their own addressable data at scale.

This is a hill TTD appears very happy to die on (or survive on, as the case may be).

“Google’s solution, the Chrome Privacy Sandbox, which only works on a Chrome browser, likely doesn’t benefit anyone other than Google,” The Trade Desk’s UK VP, Phil Duffield, tells BBC. “The advertising industry is on a collective mission to build something better.”

Although, to be fair, the advertising industry at large has been making that claim for at least as long as Google has been pushing its sandbox, with similarly little to show for it.

A New Planet

People resolve to join gyms in the new year … and gyms resolve to launch retail media networks.

Here comes the PF Media Network, an ad network operated by the Planet Fitness chain of gyms using LiveRamp for data onboarding and matching services.

Although the PF Media Network is similar to RMNs operated by other retailers, it also serves as a case study for how difficult it will be to develop industrywide RMN standards.

Planet Fitness ads span in-club placements, out-of-home static signage and wall-mounted TVs. There’s a programmatic network for the web, plus CTV and social media extensions, as well as email marketing opportunities, in-app ads and affiliate campaigns. No doubt Planet Fitness will court endemic advertisers, such as supplement and vitamin brands, both categories of which are major affiliate spenders.

While that’s all relatively standard fare for an RMN, every business has its nuances. For example, what does the screen above a deli counter have to do with an ad playing on a TV mounted on the wall in front of a standing bike?

Creating campaigns that work fluidly across many RMNs will be an uphill run.

It’s All Fun And Games Until …

… someone adds ads.

A word of caution for any company considering launching ads: The low-hanging revenue fruit must be balanced against the inevitable distortion of your business priorities.

Netflix Gaming, for example, defined itself early as an opportunity for game studios (it even acquired a few) to develop titles without accommodating the need for advertising or in-app purchases. Instead, developers could focus on the gameplay.

Now, however, Netflix is considering new ways to wring revenue from its games, The Wall Street Journal reports.

Today, Netflix games are free for subscribers. One option is to charge for more sophisticated or higher-end games to support the investment in production quality.

Or Netflix could incorporate in-game purchases and ads, which the company may do for those who subscribe to its ad-supported streaming tier. (They’re already watching ads in shows, right?)

But Netflix may not diverge from its stated vision for the gaming business, the Journal cautions. Still, the internal push and deliberation about in-game ads and payments is “the latest example of how the streamer constantly reassesses the balance between customer experience and the need to make money.”

But Wait, There’s More!

Lessons on privacy, data security, truth in advertising and AI drawn from a trio of FTC cases. [blog]

Disney’s Jeremy Helfand is headed to Amazon to lead Prime Video Advertising. [Adweek]

What the heck is going on with headlines on X? [Fortune]

Prepare for a ton of dumb, counterproductive streaming video mergers. [Techdirt]

You’re Hired!

LG Ad Solutions hires Dave Rudnick as SVP of engineering. [release]

Sarah Personette, Twitter’s former ad sales chief, joins news startup Puck as CEO. [Variety]

Must Read

Predict Bowl Icon. Magician Element, Forecasting Symbol – Vector.

Why This Marketing Measurement Company Just Open-Sourced Its Forecasting Engine

MMM can tell marketers what worked, but Lifesight’s open-sourced forecasting tool aims to tell them what to do next.

Podcasts Are Becoming More Programmatic. But Now Advertisers Have To Keep The Ad Load In Check

As programmatic buying becomes more common in audio, marketers and platforms fight the temptation to cram in as many placements as possible.

PubMatic Jumps On The Show-Level CTV Targeting Bandwagon

Connected TV advertisers are still pining after show-level control. And PubMatic announced contextual targeting at the episode level is available to media buyers accessing CTV inventory through its platform.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

SQREEM Touts The Large Behavioral Model – Not The LLM – As The Winning Predictive Engine

Rather than relying on machine learning, SQREEM uses a mathematical AI model to track how systems change over time and predict audience behavior.

Comic: Game Over?

The Google Antitrust Remedies Are Too Little, Too Late – But Publishers Will Take What They Can Get

Given how much the market has changed since the Google trial began, and the wiggle room in the ruling itself, publishers aren’t expecting much relief from the court’s behavioral remedies.

Comic: "Deal ID, please."

Can Sell-Side Curation Solve The Cookieless Audience Problem For Advertisers?

Indie agency KWG says sell-side curation can target more high-performing inventory with better match rates and lower data fees than buy-side curation.