Home Podcast Resolving LiveRamp’s Identity, With CEO Scott Howe

Resolving LiveRamp’s Identity, With CEO Scott Howe

SHARE:

You can subscribe to AdExchanger Talks on iTunes, Google Play, Spotify, Stitcher, SoundCloud or wherever you get your podcasts.

LiveRamp is by far the most widely used platform for first-party data onboarding and identity resolution. This week on the podcast, its gregarious CEO Scott Howe talks about the company’s wild ride – from private concern to Acxiom subsidiary to public company valued at $3 billion – and where it’s headed next.

According to Howe, LiveRamp’s real advantage, and its future opportunity, is all about the network effects.

“By virtue of connecting more and more constituents across the ecosystem, everybody benefits,” he says. “The bigger we get, the more value we provide to all of the constituents and the harder it is for anyone to replicate that value.”

For that reason, he says, “From the get-go we decided we were going to be neutral. We will license our capabilities to anyone and everyone who is ethical in the industry, including potential competitors. Many times when we go head to head with a potential competitor, we’re going to win either way.”

This consideration was a factor behind the 2018 sale of Acxiom to Interpublic Group. LiveRamp wanted to partner more closely with Acxiom competitors like Epsilon and Merkle, and being stand-alone let it do so.

Today, marketers are at a critical turning point when it comes to the use of data in marketing and the underpinnings of digital identity. Howe’s career has been largely focused on this issue (“My story is the story of data,” he says) and so he takes the long view. He observes data-driven personalization is not only about marketing, but also about healthcare, education, government services and other functions. It’s an unstoppable force.

“Data is not going anywhere. The utilization of data has been one of the greatest fuels of the economy that history has ever seen,” Howe says. “What we need are some guardrails.”

But there is a group that should be concerned, he adds. “Any publisher or app developer that relies on another party to do their authentication is in danger of being disintermediated.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?