Home Platforms Facebook Takes Unusual Step Of Releasing CPMs Paid By Clinton And Trump

Facebook Takes Unusual Step Of Releasing CPMs Paid By Clinton And Trump


Did Facebook’s algorithm force the Clinton campaign to pay more for ads than the Trump outfit during the 2016 US presidential election?

That’s fake news, said Facebook, which provided a rare public statement on the dynamics of its ads auction on Tuesday after claims of discriminatory pricing.

Senior Facebook exec Andrew Bosworth disclosed on Twitter that the Trump campaign paid consistently more for ads on Facebook than the Clinton campaign from late June through early November 2016. He tweeted the chart below on Tuesday afternoon.

It’s unusual for a tech platform to provide this level of transparency about its ad pricing. However, Facebook’s hand was apparently forced following boasts by Trump’s digital campaign director, Brad Parscale, on Twitter Saturday that then-candidate Trump paid “CPMs that were pennies in some cases,” and that Clinton likely shelled out 100 to 200 times more for the same ad space.

The speed with which Facebook responded indicates the priority senior management now places on addressing claims about its role in the presidential election.

So who’s right?

Parscale didn’t say how he knows Clinton paid 100 to 200 times more for ads than Trump. Perhaps CPMs were actually “pennies” on certain days in particular rural areas. Advertising costs go down in cheaper geos.

This mini tempest also highlights that Facebook’s auction doesn’t exclusively reward the highest bidder, but also factors in whether an ad is likely to generate engagement. The type of incendiary and polarizing messaging associated with the Trump campaign, in theory, generates what former Facebook staffer Antonio Garcia Martinez calls “a feedback loop” that optimizes outrage.

But Bosworth took umbrage with the notion that clickbait costs less to promote on Facebook, asserting on Twitter that the Facebook auction favors “good creative,” but only with a 10% boost in either direction.

Ad prices on Facebook also depend on factors like the size of the audience and the campaign objectives, which likely fluctuated by candidate over the course of the election.

As Boz tweeted late Monday, “Remember, price for any given impression is determined by an auction so by definition this pricing cannot be discriminatory.”

Must Read

Advertible Makes Its Case To SSPs For Running Native Channel Extensions

Companies like TripleLift that created the programmatic native category are now in their awkward tween years. Cue Advertible, a “native-as-a-service” programmatic vendor, as put by co-founder and CEO Tom Anderson.

Mozilla acquires Anonym

Mozilla Acquires Anonym, A Privacy Tech Startup Founded By Two Top Former Meta Execs

Two years after leaving Meta to launch their own privacy-focused ad measurement startup in 2022, Graham Mudd and Brad Smallwood have sold their company to Mozilla.

Nope, We Haven’t Hit Peak Retail Media Yet

The move from in-store to digital shopper marketing continues, as United Airlines, Costco, PayPal, Chase and Expedia make new retail media plays. Plus: what the DSP Madhive saw in advertising sales software company Frequence.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Ad-ception

The New York Times And Instacart Integrate For Shoppable Recipes

The New York Times and Instacart are partnering for shoppable recipe videos.

Experian Enters The Third-Party Data Onboarding Business

Experian entered the third-party data onboarder market on Tuesday with a new product based on its Tapad acquisition.

Albertsons Takes Its First Steps Into Non-Endemic Advertising, Retail Media’s Next Frontier

Albertsons is taking that first step into non-endemic advertising next week via a partnership with Rokt to serve ads to people who have already purchased groceries.