Home On TV & Video Addressable’s Next Step Won’t Be Fueled By Connected TV

Addressable’s Next Step Won’t Be Fueled By Connected TV

SHARE:

On TV and Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Chris Maccaro, CEO at Beachfront.

The market for addressable TV advertising is projected to almost double in the next two years. 

Over the last several months, the rapid rise in addressable has been driven by increases in the number of connected TV devices as consumers shift toward streaming. The next step for addressable, however, won’t be fueled by connected TV, but instead by bringing addressability to traditional linear TV. EMarketer estimates that addressability could contribute more than $3.6 billion in TV advertising by 2022. 

There are three reasons why legacy TV is the key to addressability: 

  1. Pay TV’s resilient scale;
  2. Media buyers’ diversified TV investments; and 
  3. Infrastructure retrofitting opportunities.  

Pay TV’s scale: Even when considering the enormous shifts of 2020, traditional TV as we know it is not going away anytime soon, and as the eMarketer chart below shows, it’s still where audiences are spending the most time. Both pay TV and non-pay-TV households are predicted to sit at 60+ million through 2024. 

Also, consider the financial impact of pay TV’s resilient scale: advertisers will spend the most money on cable and broadcast television. By investing in these environments, and how and when they decide to serve addressable ads, it meets TV advertisers where they are already, versus trying to convince them there’s a better opportunity elsewhere.

Media buyers’ diversified TV investments: Here’s where things get interesting as increasingly savvy, modern media buyers push the industry further into transformation. Connected TV has democratized access to TV inventory for more digitally inclined ad buyers, who are jumping on the opportunity to invest in impressions and spots on the biggest screen in the home. Programmers benefit tremendously from bringing linear into the fold, commingling traditional TV inventory with this CTV inventory and unlocking pent up addressable dollars from a wider set of advertisers. 

Infrastructure retrofitting opportunities: Today, the physical infrastructure of pay TV is embedded in more than 70 million homes in the United States. Even with small declines moving forward, pay TV’s unquestionable scale requires comparable technological advancement to what’s transformed connected TV the past several years. There are ways to retrofit traditional TV’s infrastructure. It takes time, but the business opportunity is just too big to ignore, and shouldn’t be discarded simply because of the growing prowess of streaming TV. 

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Let’s recap and discuss the best path forward for making addressability a reality in legacy TV.

For starters, programmers need decisioning systems that connect disparate viewing points. Pay TV — across local and national, broadcast and cable — is capable of providing lucrative addressable opportunities, yet it lacks the advertising infrastructure needed to fully capitalize on those opportunities. 

Further, industry-accepted measurement standards and use of more first-party data are critical. Legacy TV infrastructure changes may even help on the measurement side; with uniform buying comes uniform measurement. 

Most importantly, advertisers hold the purse strings. It’s tough to deny the trend of brands seeking a shift to more efficient, uniform ad buying practices across all forms of media. 

Buyers are already shifting from manual insertion orders to more advanced systems that are capable of automating creative delivery and versioning in real-time. As a result, programmers require more sophisticated decisioning engines built to handle addressable functionality. 

These technologies include single advertiser slot optimization (SASO) and multiple advertiser slot optimization (MASO), the latter of which may necessitate the ability to manage high-frequency ad trading and mediation across hundreds of buyers (and multiple creatives per those buyers).

Establishing these systems takes collaboration and resources from networks, MVPDs and advertisers — even as ad tech providers and TV manufacturers (themselves, providers of ad tech infrastructure at this point) have already done a good bit of legwork there.

By doing the necessary infrastructure work to commingle legacy TV and connected TV inventory, we can accelerate our collective path toward a more addressable future.

Follow Beachfront (@beachfrontmedia) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.

Will Alternative TV Currencies Ever Be More Than A Nielsen Add-On?

Ever since Nielsen was dinged for undercounting TV viewers during the pandemic, its competitors have been fighting to convince buyers and sellers alike to adopt them as alternatives. And yet, some industry insiders argue that alt currencies weren’t ever meant to supplant Nielsen.