Home On TV & Video More Pros Than Cons In CTV Fragmentation

More Pros Than Cons In CTV Fragmentation

SHARE:

“On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Tal Chalozin, CTO and cofounder at Innovid.

Connected TV is everywhere. With 83% of all American homes projected to have at least one CTV device by 2023, it’s clear there’s a massive opportunity for connecting with audiences. Unfortunately, it’s not quite as simple as it sounds. Fragmentation across apps, devices, and platforms means that while most viewers are benefiting from CTV, it’s still a challenge for marketers to reach and measure their audiences in a unified way. However, while fragmentation does create some challenges for marketers looking to scale their campaigns on CTV, it also presents some significant opportunities for ad buyers.

The price is right

Fragmentation means competition, and competition means lower prices. When platforms have to compete against one another to secure ad dollars, then the number one lever available to them is their price. As long as the connected TV space remains heavily fragmented, marketers will benefit from a buyer’s market.

Much like the early days of social media advertising when multiple competing platforms offered incredible reach for comparative pennies, marketers have a unique opportunity to hit a huge number of new customers with their message for a fraction of the price of linear television.  Already 24% of marketers have identified a cost effective CPM as their reason for making the switch from linear to CTV. Although we expect that over time that price of CTV will rise due to consolidation, right now marketers have a unique opportunity to scale fast for cheap.

Innovation becomes the norm

Competition doesn’t only drive prices down, it also inspires innovation. A critical way that CTV providers compete for advertisers’ attention is with new technologies, tools, and solutions to sweeten their core offering. For example when compared to standard pre-roll, advanced creative ad experiences on CTV drive roughly an 8% better completion rate. A fragmented CTV ecosystem keeps everyone on their toes and ensures evolving advertising formats and products from top providers to strive for better performance and push boundaries on what’s possible creatively.

Marketers reconsider legacy solutions

CTV has ushered in an opportunity for broadcast TV advertisers to reevaluate their legacy measurement solutions, allowing them to lean into digital and gain more optimization opportunities. Marketers can not only choose where to spend and what audiences they want to reach but with streaming, they also gain a wealth of new ways to measure their ROI. Eighty-eight percent of marketers listed media specific ROI and objective measurement as an important focus to them. With that in mind, new CTV players are rushing to build solutions that directly prove their unique platform’s value, all with the goal of gaining more media dollars. This has led to a race for comprehensive and transparent reporting, continuing to push the TV measurement industry forward. While fragmentation doesn’t necessarily make life easier for marketers, it does give them an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of their performance.

Fragmentation: friend or foe? 

CTV is at a critical inflection point. It’s reached wide adoption, but a dominant player hasn’t yet emerged. Roku is in the lead with 84.7 million users last year, but it’s not without competition from Amazon Fire TV which has 71.2 million users. Right now, marketers have an unprecedented opportunity to reach new customers at a lower cost and with more control than they could ever expect from traditional broadcast television. While fragmentation poses challenges, it also allows marketers to play a pivotal role in shaping this emerging media ecosystem. The choices marketers make today about where to spend their advertising dollars will no doubt shape the future of CTV. Incentivizing interoperability now will be key to ensuring future transparency, and act as a check on any dominant players that may emerge. For marketers well positioned to take advantage of these opportunities, CTV fragmentation could be the key to a new era of brand success.

Follow Tal Chalozin  (@Chalozin) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Tagged in:

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.