Home Digital TV and Video How LG Works Advertising Into Smart TVs

How LG Works Advertising Into Smart TVs

SHARE:

Thanks to its smart TVs, LG Electronics controls a channel that can bring the granularity of digital advertising into the world of connected TV.

But LG is a consumer electronics manufacturer, not an advertising company, and in recent years it has learned how to accommodate a new business practice.

Its first foray into ad monetization began around 2011, when it embedded YuMe’s smart-TV SDK to deliver banner and pre-roll ads in the LG smart-TV navigation screen and its own applications.

But LG has since gone beyond display ads on menu screens.

In 2016, it partnered with OTT services provider Xumo to launch a streaming service, Channel Plus, which is baked into LG smart TVs.

Channel Plus has an interface like a channel guide, but showcases digital content instead of cable TV shows – which let LG go beyond banners.

“Serving pre-, mid- and post-roll video ads into [TV streams] serves a purpose,” said Matt Durgin, LG Electronics USA’s director of content innovation. “It brings those experiences right into the TV stream by giving consumers content they want and then monetizes it with advertising.”

LG and Xumo use device-level insights to improve the viewing experience.

“Data is integral and necessary to run the system for a basic mechanics perspective,” said Xumo CEO Colin Petrie-Norris. “You need data so the consumer can find the content they’re looking for. It’s part of consent-based advertising, where there’s a value exchange, and maybe you get access to free or additional content [for viewing an ad].”

Accessing IP-level information is also important for content licensing, or even mandatory in certain cases, when a content partner relies on the geographical coordinates of a device to ensure compliance in video delivery, Durgin added.

For instance, a sports broadcaster might use that information to block certain geos or households from viewing a Yankees game because of league licensing requirements.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Also, device-level insights from LG let Xumo surface the best content recommendations and activate frequency capping – because unlike the digital world, there are no cookies in OTT.

Despite LG’s growing involvement in advertising and data, however, it has decided against fielding its own ad sales force – letting YuMe sell the display inventory and Xumo sell the inventory available through Channel Plus – because its specialty is hardware, not ad monetization.

LG is worried that pivoting into ad sales could undermine its culture.

“The only real reason to do it yourself is because you want a bigger percentage of the monetization, but for us, it makes more sense to have efficiency and stability we’re getting through our partners right now,” Durgin said.

Data And Privacy

But what about selling data?

With its smart TVs, LG has direct insight into consumption habits, which is gold to advertisers, data marketers and TV networks looking to recoup viewers lost to cord cutting.

But LG says it’s not engaging in this line of business.

“As a TV manufacturer, the stage we’re in as a company is to continue to increase value to consumers as opposed to increasing means of monetization with [audience] matching,” Durgin said.

“We know that space exists and there’s value there, but we’re in no rush. The most important thing I can do for LG is to continue driving more value to consumers.”

And data activation in and of itself remains a hot-button area for OTT providers – look no further than Vizio’s litigation around claims it harvested consumer information without gaining an explicit opt-in.

But LG emphasizes its sound privacy policy.

“We were trying to find the right balance so consumers didn’t feel like using this television was going to have a negative impact on their privacy expectations,” Durgin said. “We hired a legal firm (in 2013) who specializes in consumer privacy, they rewrote our privacy agreements to [include in each of our] devices in [plain] English.”

LG’s new privacy policy aimed to facilitate choice in consumer opt-ins.

For example, a user could disable the ads data collection mechanism, as well as turn off their microphone on their remote control, despite the mic’s inability to render without being first prompted, Durgin said.

The intent, he said, “was to give [consumers] an extra layer of control.”

Ryan Joe contributed.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.