Home Data-Driven Thinking AI Disclosure Requirements: Navigating State Laws And Platform Rules

AI Disclosure Requirements: Navigating State Laws And Platform Rules

SHARE:
Richard Eisert, partner and co-chair of the advertising + marketing and privacy, technology + data security practice groups, Davis+Gilbert
Amy Marcus, associate, Davis+Gilbert

As AI quickly advances and legislators struggle to keep up, it can feel like the Wild West when choosing whether and how to disclose the use of AI in advertising and other communications. 

However, even though the number and scope of formal mandates under existing U.S. law that require advertisers to disclose the use of AI are limited, there are some restrictions and guidelines that advertisers must follow to ensure their compliance. 

Most notably, some states have passed—and others are actively considering—legislation governing AI disclosures in certain specific circumstances. Social media platforms, including Meta (Facebook and Instagram), TikTok, YouTube and even Reddit, have also set their own rules surrounding the type of AI advertising content that requires disclosures and how those disclosures must be structured.

Limited regulations by the states

While there is currently no AI-specific federal regulatory requirement for disclosure in advertising or media, a handful of states have enacted or are attempting to pass limited legislation that is relevant to the AI discussion. 

California, New Jersey and Utah all require customer service chatbots or similar communication tools fueled by generative artificial intelligence to clearly disclose to users that they are communicating with a bot rather than a real human, especially when a purchase or voting is involved.

Moreover, many states have enacted legislation pertaining specifically to the use of AI-generated or manipulated content in political ads. California, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Nevada, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin have all passed laws in the last two years mandating disclosures when the content of political advertisements or other political communications or content includes AI-generated content, including but not limited to the use of deepfakes.

Other states also require these types of disclosures, but only within a certain amount of time before an election. Several more states now have proposed and pending legislation that pertains to the use of AI in political ads.

Broader proposed state legislation

In June 2025, the New York State Legislature became the first to take AI legislation a step further by passing the Synthetic Performer Disclosure Bill, which requires that advertisers make clear and conspicuous disclosures whenever an advertisement includes AI-generated talent, or a “synthetic performer.” The bill is still awaiting Governor Kathy Hochul’s signature. However, the action taken by the New York State Legislature represents a major additional step in the regulatory landscape of AI labeling and disclosure in advertising.

Other states, including Georgia, have introduced bills requiring disclosures whenever AI-generated content is used in advertising or commerce. Massachusetts has gone even further with its proposed legislation. The Massachusetts Artificial Intelligence Disclosure Act, introduced in February 2025, would require any generative AI system used to create or modify content within the state to automatically include a clear, conspicuous and permanent disclosure identifying the content as AI-generated.

Social media guidelines

While state and federal governments slowly move towards proposing and advancing more comprehensive AI labeling and disclosure requirements, social media platforms are filling the gaps with their own rules. 

Many of these rules are directed specifically at deceptively realistic AI-generated video, audio and imagery, and include penalties for failing to disclose AI’s role in creating this type of content that can result in such content being removed from the platform. 

Penalties on many of these platforms also increase for repeated offenses. For example, YouTube states that creators who consistently choose not to make the requisite AI disclosures may be suspended from YouTube’s Partner Program.

Advertisers that routinely rely on social media platforms to distribute advertisements must be familiar with the following guidance from major social media platforms regarding labeling and disclosures on AI-generated or altered content, or risk incurring penalties:

  • Meta (e.g.,Facebook, Instagram) regulates the labeling of digitally generated or altered photorealistic video or realistic-sounding audio. Users must label the content (whether in post, story, or Reel form) through their settings before posting. Meta is currently also rolling out a feature in which any ads generated using Meta’s generative AI creative features will automatically be labeled “AI info.” 
  • TikTok requires posters to disclose the use of AI relating to realistic images, video and audio. The platform further strongly encourages that disclosures be added to fully AI-generated or significantly AI-edited content, beyond the use of filters or minor retouching.
  • Reddit does not have its own set of comprehensive AI disclosure requirements.  However, many individual subreddits have strict rules regarding the use of AI-generated content enforced by active moderators. Moderators can regulate and remove content as needed if it violates the subreddit’s rules.
  • YouTube mandates that creators include a disclosure for any content that is meaningfully altered or synthetically generated and appears realistic. Creators must add this disclosure during the upload process. YouTube reserves the right to apply the disclosure retroactively if the creator fails to include it.

The bottom line

Just because U.S. federal and state regulations have been slow to catch up to the AI boom does not mean that advertisers always have carte blanche to use AI systems or AI-generated content without notifying consumers. 

While legislators debate the correct path forward to ensure that consumers have appropriate transparency regarding the use of AI, some relevant laws have already been enacted and others are on the way. At the same time, advertisers must keep in mind the multitude of still-developing labeling and disclosure requirements imposed on AI-generated content by social media platforms.

“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Follow Davis+Gilbert and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Richard Eisert, click here.

Must Read

VideoAmp Bets On AI To Connect Ad Planning And Measurement

VideoAmp is competing in the measurement space by sharpening its focus on TV audience data, ad performance and, of course, AI. The company is also making strategic hires and promoting from within.

Comic: Header Bidding Rapper (Wrapper!)

Sure, Debates Between Prebid Members Can Get Heated. That’s Why It’s The Programmatic Melting Pot

The Prebid Summit in New York City on Tuesday exceeded the event’s reputation for liveliness.

Has The Ad Industry Lost The Pulse Of American Consumers?

The ad industry has become a community of people who say things like “This is going to sound relatable” and follow it up with a sentence that may as well be Martian to 99% of America.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

LG And Magnite Launch Agentic Home Screen Ads With A Winning NFL Quarterback

LG home screen inventory is now available through agentic buying, opening up a premium TV placement to faster, more automated campaign setup.

Prebid’s Proposed Auction Overhaul Would Do What The Court Wouldn’t: Separate AdX From GAM

Reorienting the ad auction so that ad servers bid into Prebid lets publishers access demand from Google AdX without also having to use Google’s ad server.

Meet Starling, The Startup That Says It’s More Than Just Another CTV SSP

Starling recently launched as a connected TV SSP and wants to capitalize on the opportunity to address a major pain point facing CTV marketers: the lack of show-level data.