Home Data Kogan: Cambridge Analytica’s Supposed Data Genius Was Just Hack Work

Kogan: Cambridge Analytica’s Supposed Data Genius Was Just Hack Work

SHARE:

It’s been a weird four months for Aleksandr Kogan.

The 33-year-old went from an obscure research psychologist at Cambridge University to one of the villains at the heart of the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Kogan, who testified Tuesday before a Senate Commerce subcommittee, apologized for his role in the controversy, but disputes that the data provided by his personality app to Cambridge Analytica swung the 2016 US presidential election.

“If the goal of Cambridge Analytica was to show personalized ads on Facebook based on people’s personalities, what they did was stupid,” Kogan said.

Instead, Cambridge Analytica attempted to reinvent the wheel and failed.

Kogan developed a personality quiz called “This Is Your Digital Life On Facebook” that was downloaded by around 300,000 users. Under Facebook’s policy at the time, Kogan collected friend-related data via those users without their permission, which enabled Kogan to get data on between 50 million and 87 million people.

He eventually sold that data to Cambridge Analytica, which got name, location, birthday, gender and presumed personality traits, such as extrovert, agreeableness or adventurousness, based on page likes.

But the application of this data set left a lot to be desired, Kogan said.

It just wasn’t all that effective for microtargeting. That Cambridge Analytica somehow weaponized the internet as part of a mind-control effort to dupe people into voting in ways they normally wouldn’t is, he said, “science fiction.”

“Psychographics as a whole is a dead end for [marketing],” said Kogan, who claimed he went into the project thinking it could pan out. “There is value to the data if you’re trying to understand the general trends of big groups of people – but for any one person, it simply doesn’t work.”

After studying the data, Kogan discovered that for every five personality traits he tried to predict, he was only accurate for around 1% of users. For 5-6% of users, he was wrong about everything.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Kogan concluded that better accuracy could be achieved by just “simply assuming everybody is average in everything,” he said.

On reflection, there was no point in even embarking on the project. Cambridge Analytica tried to derive insights for microtargeted advertising based on a smattering of page likes and only 30 million profiles – a fraction of Facebook’s more than 200 million users in the US. In other words, the sample was too small and the targeting signals too scant.

Cambridge Analytica would have done better if it had just run a survey to collect a bunch of email addresses and used Facebook’s ad platform to create lookalike audiences rather than trying to develop its own models.

“Facebook will use a lot more of its data than just page likes to build models,” Kogan said.

But, regardless of whether Cambridge Analytica was able to perform ad tech alchemy, people still have a right to feel angry and violated that their data was collected by third parties they had no control over, he said.

“Just the fact that data can be accessed elicits a strong, visceral response,” Kogan said. “I’ve naturally taken a hard look in the mirror at my own role in the controversy. What is clear to me now is that I made a mistake in not appreciating how people would feel about us using their data, and for that, I’m deeply sorry.”

Must Read

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.

TikTok Video For Open Web Publishers? Outbrain Built It.

Outbrain is trying to shed its chumbox rep by bringing social media-style vertical video to mobile publishers on the open web.

Billups Launches Attention Measurement For Out-Of-Home

Billups, a managed services agency that specializes in OOH, is making its attention measurement solution and a related analytics dashboard available for general use.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria

The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Case Is Over – And Here’s What’s Happening Next

Just three weeks after it began, the Google ad tech antitrust trial in Virginia is over. The court will now take a nearly two-month break before reconvening for closing arguments right before Thanksgiving.

Jounce Media's Chris Kane at Programmatic IO NY on Sept. 25, 2024.

The Bidstream Is A Duplicative, Chaotic Mess – But It Doesn’t Have To Be That Way

Publishers are initiating more and more auctions – but doesn’t mean DSPs are listening to more bids, according to Chris Kane.

Readers Are Flocking To Political News, Says WaPo – And Advertisers Are Missing Out

During certain periods this year, advertisers blocked more than 40% of The Washington Post’s inventory over brand safety concerns.