Home Daily News Roundup Google Paid Advertisers To Buy Certain Media Types; Brand Safety Is Ruining The News

Google Paid Advertisers To Buy Certain Media Types; Brand Safety Is Ruining The News

SHARE:

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here.

Rebate and Switch

There’s already a lot to sift through among the many recently unsealed documents for the DOJ’s antitrust trial against Google – but one interesting tidbit has already surfaced. Namely, Google’s plan to pay agencies for purchasing certain types of media.

As Adweek reports, Google’s media rebate program wasn’t a secret. As AdExchanger reported at the time, it’s been around since at least 2016. (It’s not clear whether it still exists today.) But some of the finer details of that program – which included discounts, cash back and other financial incentives – haven’t been publicly available until now.

The documents outline both the types of media Google wanted to boost and how much it was willing to pay to advertisers in 2018, which was around $445 million total across several incentive programs.  

Adweek’s sources theorize that these documents will serve as proof that Google has concrete, quantifiable influence over how brand media budgets are spent. However, we won’t know for sure what the DOJ’s plans are until the trial begins in earnest on September 9.

The Safety Dance

Cancel culture is ruining the media business, Business Insider reports – but not in the way you may think.

Brand safety concerns are having a noticeable financial impact on publishers that post anything other than feel-good fluff pieces.

What’s more, this issue cuts across both sides of the political aisle. Media buyers are afraid of enraging conservatives by appearing to care about things like diversity or LGBTQ people, but in 2016 it was liberal organizations leading boycotts against advertisers appearing on alt-right websites.

It’s gotten to the point that Time Magazine reportedly lost ad revenue on its 2023 Person of the Year feature – arguably the thing Time is best known for – because its subject, pop star Taylor Swift, talked about feminism in the interview.

Clearly, something needs to change. But so far the best anybody can come up with is forcing advertisers to spend money equally across right- and left-leaning publications, which would probably just make everybody mad.

Moderation In Moderation

Here’s another sign that brand safety and content moderation have become politicized: Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg apologized to Republicans in Congress for his company’s attempts to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 presidential election, The Washington Post reports.

Zuckerberg sent a letter to Republican Congressman Jim Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, saying that Meta was “repeatedly pressured” by the Biden administration to censor certain content on its platforms related to the pandemic and also content about that now-infamous laptop owned by President Joe Biden’s son Hunter.

Zuckerberg says he believes it was “wrong” of the Biden administration to call for the removal of certain posts, echoing Republican criticisms. However, Zuckerberg stressed that any content moderation decisions were ultimately made by Meta.

The letter is Meta’s first public response to a lawsuit brought by 19 Republican attorneys general, charging that the Biden administration illegally pressured social platforms to censor conservative speech under the guise of fighting misinformation.

Going forward, Meta will wait to make a final determination as to whether a post contains misinformation before deprioritizing it, rather than proactively suppressing potentially false content.

Critics warn this change will allow falsehoods to flourish during the 2024 election. But House Judiciary Republicans trumpeted Meta’s decision as a “big win for free speech.”

But Wait, There’s More!

Surprise, ad industry professionals! According to a new study, you’re all depressed! [Campaign] 

Some websites are still tracking people who said they don’t want to be tracked. [Adweek] 

Gannett, accused last year of publishing AI-generated content on Reviewed.com, is shutting the entire site down. [The Verge]

Here’s a rare digital media success story: Gary Vaynerchuk-owned Gallery Media Group has been profitable since 2011 and expects to end this year with $50 million in revenue, mostly from sponsored social content. [Axios]

You’re Hired!

Goodway Group hires Rick Watrall as chief data and analytics officer. [release]

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?