Home AdExchanger Talks Sweeping Away The Crumbs And Diving Into What’s Truly Important In Privacy

Sweeping Away The Crumbs And Diving Into What’s Truly Important In Privacy

SHARE:

There was a time, perhaps eight or nine years ago, when the industry could feasibly argue in favor of self-regulation because of the complexity of online advertising and the rapid nature of technological innovation.

But that ship has long sailed, says Jules Polonetsky, CEO of privacy-focused nonprofit the Future of Privacy Forum, speaking on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

Despite the unceasing conversation about third-party cookies (including in the pages of AdExchanger), privacy protection today is about a lot more than being followed around the internet by the proverbial banner ad for the sneakers you already bought.

“It’s about misinformation; it’s about competition. It’s about human rights and the incredible impact that personalization and technology have on our lives,” Polonetsky says. “And that needs to be settled not by companies or think tanks but by the democratic legal process.”

But the ad industry tends to get lost in its own weeds.

First-party data, third-party data, zero-party data: These terms, and the distinctions between them, are not all that important to data protection authorities and lawmakers. They care more about transparency, proportionality, purpose limitation and the balance of power between government, large companies and individual citizens.

“You need to have some legal reason for why you’re doing what you’re doing,” Polonetsky said. “There should be some minimization and fairness – these are enormously useful concepts, because they help shape society and power.”

Also in this episode: A critique of the Federal Trade Commission’s approach to privacy protection, the proliferation of state privacy laws, the over/under on when the US will finally get a national privacy law, Polonetsky’s experience as DoubleClick’s first-ever chief privacy officer between 2000 and 2020, privacy lessons from the Talmud and the somewhat unlikely connection between wine and European data protection.

For more articles featuring Jules Polonetsky, click here.

Must Read

The Trade Desk Maintains Its High Growth Rate And Touts New Channels

“It’s hard not to be bullish about CTV when it’s both our largest channel and our fastest growing,” said The Trade Desk Founder and CEO Green during the company’s earnings report on Thursday.

After The Election, News Corp Has Harsh Words For Advertisers Who Avoided News

News Corp’s chief exec blasted “the blatant biases of ad agencies and ad associations,” which are “boycotting certain media properties” due to “personal political prejudices.”

LiveRamp Outperforms On Earnings And Lays Out Its Data Network Ambitions

LiveRamp reported an unexpected boost to Q3 revenue, from $160 million last year to $185 million in 2024, during its quarterly call with investors on Wednesday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google in the antitrust crosshairs (Law concept. Single line draw design. Full length animation illustration. High quality 4k footage)

Google And The DOJ Recap Their Cases In The Countdown To Closing Arguments

If you’re trying to read more than 1,000 pages of legal documents about the US v. Google ad tech antitrust case on Election Day, you’ve come to the right place.

NYT’s Ad And Subscription Revenue Surge As WaPo Flails

While WaPo recently lost 250,000 subscribers due to concerns over its journalistic independence, NYT added 260,000 subscriptions in Q3 thanks largely to the popularity of its non-news offerings.

Mark Proulx, global director of media quality & responsibility, Kenvue

How Kenvue Avoided $3 Million In Wasted Media Spend

Stop thinking about brand safety verification as “insurance” – a way to avoid undesirable content – and start thinking about it as an opportunity to build positive brand associations, says Kenvue’s Mark Proulx.