Home CTV OpenX Volunteers Itself As Head Of The CTV Cleanup Crew

OpenX Volunteers Itself As Head Of The CTV Cleanup Crew

SHARE:

CTV advertising is experiencing some growing pains, especially in its convoluted supply chain. Issues include auction duplication from header-bidding products and a blend of high- and low-quality ad products that obfuscate what media buyers get for their money.

Which is to say, welcome to programmatic. But when will advertisers investigate CTV, since many accept the media as premium without knowing the content and formats where their ads appear?

“The industry is long overdue for revisiting what is considered CTV,” said Geoff Wolinetz, SVP of publisher and demand platforms at the SSP OpenX. “When people think about CTV, they don’t focus on the C. They focus on the TV.”

On Thursday, OpenX announced its own reevaluation of the CTV supply chain: a twofold initiative called TV+, which reserves the CTV label for what the company deems premium inventory and kicks resellers out of the supply pool.

Lean-back linear

What OpenX classifies as premium CTV is highly produced or curated content that audiences consume in a way that mimics a “lean back” linear TV experience. In other words, watching longer or episodic content on the big screen on the wall.

OpenX defines “non-TV” content as everything else: dating apps like Roku Rendezvous, gaming apps like Apple Arcade, smart TV home-screen panels and streaming apps meant to capture ad money while building no audience (the classics include holiday fireplace screensavers and channels meant for pets to watch when their humans aren’t home).

There is a caveat, though. OpenX sees mobile or web information like the device, browser and OS, but it relies on publishers to self-classify their inventory in the bidstream as, say, CTV or online video.

The non-TV label is not a value judgment, Wolinetz said. Advertisers can still buy against this inventory; it just won’t be included in TV+.

Clean break

In biddable environments, the buyer and seller of CTV inventory are often many hops away from one another. This can dilute the inventory or poach attribution value from the media, Wolinetz said.

Rather than only removing the so-called “bad actors” from the system, he said OpenX is cutting out resellers completely for TV+.

Other sell-side players have CTV products that reduce vendor fees in the name of SPO, but none eliminate resellers entirely.

OpenX may take an initial revenue hit, Wolinetz said. But it’s a calculated risk. The SSP is betting that advertisers “will transact with us because we’re demonstrating this level of transparency.”

Trust me

Currently, buyers have two main choices to buy CTV.

First, one-to-one private marketplace deals directly with programmers. These are widely considered a strong strategy, but they have pricing problems and can lack scale, said Chris Kane, founder of Jounce Media.

Buyers can also buy via the open auction or auction packages that are “window dressing on the open auctions,” Kane said. But they could be buying a deal ID that bundles together many publishers and doesn’t protect against low-quality auctions.

“What is missing is a trusted marketplace where buyers have the opportunity to bid into high-quality auctions, like direct supply chains, to publishers they trust,” he said.

OpenX’s TV+ is providing buyers with a third option for accessing CTV inventory that automatically handles inventory curation on the sell side of the market, Kane said.

The jury is still out on whether buyers will reward OpenX for removing low-quality products from the shelves – and whether other SSPs will see those rewards and come out with similar initiatives. In part, it will depend on how much buy-side demand there is for low-quality inventory.

Ultimately, OpenX is invested in growing CTV the right way, Wolinetz said.

“Given that CTV is the child of display and television, how can we take the best of both of those media?” he said. “How can we help guide it to adulthood?”

Must Read

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?

A comic showing lab techs as stand-ins for legislators experimenting with provisions for US state privacy laws, including restrictions on collecting sensitive data.

What Publishers Don't Know About New Jersey’s Data Broker Law Could Cost Them

Attention, publishers: Although you might not think of yourself as a data broker, in the great state of New Jersey, that’s not really your call anymore.