Home The Sell Sider How Direct Deals Are Evolving In The Age Of Programmatic

How Direct Deals Are Evolving In The Age Of Programmatic

SHARE:

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Erik Requidan, vice president of programmatic strategy at Intermarkets.

In a recent podcast, Chris Kane explained three ways that buyers navigate the complex programmatic supply landscape. The hardest: direct-to-publisher integrations.

Some of the biggest names in media have tweaked their ad sales structures, compensation and inventory offerings for programmatic direct, programmatic guaranteed and private deals. These tweaks have been enabled by automation, data and software.

Many of these deals are being counted as direct, but direct deals have changed significantly in the age of programmatic.

The way they were

Throughout the history of digital direct sales, premium deals were defined mainly by two major criteria: the deal’s price point, and whether it had been handled by human beings.

Direct sales used to be solely human-to-human – a mostly manual process that involved scheduling deals, running custom reports, handling insertion orders and negotiating price points. Marketers needed calculators to determine whether or not they were meeting KPIs, and created elaborate presentations to prove to stakeholders that goals were being met.

Planning, buying, launching and managing direct deals can all be automated today. Buyers and sellers still meet and discuss all of the requirements of an RFP, but no longer need the IOs in a traditional sense. Great software has been created to schedule direct placements, use negotiated price points and even allow in-depth reporting. Campaign goals, key performance indicators and all of the metrics that help both sides understand struggles and success can happen even faster than ever.

The way they were priced

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Direct deals used to be focused on “premium inventory” – as an example, CPMs higher than $10. But premiums exist at many price points and many levels now – there is a premium at $48 CPM and, believe it or not, there is a premium at $1.75 CPM.

We often forget that in each campaign, the needs and goals of an advertiser vary greatly. The metrics of success may change on the fly, and the price of inventory and bids must adapt in real time. Auction-based buying has improved dramatically in this regard and will continue to do so.

Just doing deals

Definitions and meanings change over time – today, direct and programmatic direct are merging to become one and the same. Automating guaranteed and direct made direct buys more efficient, rather than producing radically better direct buys.

History will show that programmatic has delivered more value than traditional direct buys, while helping us find ways to improve upon those buys. It’s led publishers to experiment with the way they allowed direct and programmatic demand to compete with each other over impressions in real time. The result has been significant growth in yield and, when done right, an overall increase in CPMs, pricing and deals.

And buy-side partners are finding more of what they want in the form of inventory and users. In many cases, demand coming from programmatic is higher than direct buys.

Progressive publishers are striking new forms of direct private deals, such as private marketplaces and deal IDs with buyers, at premium price points. These are stepping stones into a future where legacy direct sales and programmatic converge.

If publishers want to control and ensure fair market pricing versus list pricing – and facilitate the buying and selling of audiences or identities – then we will have become the exchange. And the days of auctions being either open or private, and direct or indirect, will fade into just doing deals.

Follow Erik Requidan (@Requidan), Intermarkets (@intermarkets) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

shopping cart

Moloco Invests In Its Competitor Topsort As The Retail Media Stakes Go Up

Topsort can lean into Moloco’s algorithmic personalization, while Moloco benefits from Topsort’s footprint with local retailers in the US and in Latin America.

CDP BlueConic Acquires First-Party Data Collection Startup Jebbit

On Wednesday, customer data platform BlueConic bought Jebbit, which creates quizzes, surveys and other interactive online plugs for collecting data from customers.

Comic: The Showdown (Google vs. DOJ)

The DOJ’s Witness List For The Google Antitrust Trial Is A Who’s Who Of Advertising

The DOJ published the witness list for its upcoming antitrust trial against Google, and it reads like the online advertising industry’s answer to the Social Register.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Why Vodafone Is Giving Out Grades For Its Creative

One way to get a handle on your brand creative is to, well, grade your homework, according to Anne Stilling, Vodafone’s global director of brands and media.

Inside The Fall Of Oracle’s Advertising Business

By now, the industry is well aware that Oracle, once the most prominent advertising data seller in market, will shut down its advertising division. What’s behind the ignominious end of Oracle Advertising?

Forget about asking for permission to collect cookies. Google will have to ask for permission to not collect them.

Criteo: The Privacy Sandbox Is NOT Ready Yet, But Could Be If Google Makes Certain Changes Soon

If Google were to shut off third-party cookies today and implement the current version of the Privacy Sandbox, publishers would see their ad revenue on Chrome tank by around 60% on average.