Home Online Advertising How Buy-Side Platforms Are Fighting Online Ad Fraud

How Buy-Side Platforms Are Fighting Online Ad Fraud

SHARE:

buyside-botnetOnline ad fraud bubbled up in a big way last month, after London-based Spider.io published details of a botnet responsible for generating billions of illegitimate impressions per month.

The sites that are selling allegedly non-viewable impressions from the Chameleon botnet are not widely recognized brands. Reports have identified Alphabird and DigiMogul as among the site networks benefitting from such practices. Given the relative anonymity of such sites, it’s easy for the agencies and demand-side platforms [DSPs] to look the other way, especially if ad placements on such properties appear to be performing – via clicks, false roll-overs, or other counterfeited engagement metrics. (Transactions are harder to fake.)

While the blame for illegitimate impressions has tended to fall to these publishers and their exchange partners, many feel marketers, agencies, and platforms on the demand-side also have responsibility to police the ecosystem. Integral Ad Science CTO Will Luttrell argued the point in an AdExchanger column last week. The Ghostery browser plug-in reveals dozens of tags from buy-side platforms on one of the websites linked to the Chameleon botnet. Aren’t these companies concerned they will end up pushing ads to such properties?

The short answer most will give: Of course they’re concerned. But some are more eager to talk about it than others.

Among several companies contacted by AdExchanger, DataXu and Turn replied with details of their policies and mechanisms to protect against fraudulent impressions.

“At DataXu, we’re aware of this situation and others like it, and have been proactively working to clean our supply chain and build our forensics capabilities from day one,” says Adrian Tompsett, the Boston-based firm’s VP Business Development. “We take these types of issues very seriously and are extremely vigilant about policing our supply chain.”

Tompsett says DataXu’s approach is multi-layered, including monitoring publisher quality through a manual review process while also using brand safety and contextual filtering vendors to ensure domain and URL integrity.

“Ultimately, the end game for our clients is about marketing effectiveness, and this concerted and specific effort by DataXu ensures better media for our brands every day,” he says.

Joshua Koran, SVP of product management at Turn, says advertisers are the ultimate victims of click fraud. He pins the responsibility on publishers and their yield partners, but acknowledges DSPs and marketers must insist on quality. To that end, Turn has a ‘three strikes’ policy to ensure publishers operate in accordance with its inventory guidelines.

“As a technology platform that supports thousands of advertisers, we’re actively working with the publisher side to ensure they appropriately vet the inventory they offer up for sale,” he says.

Two other DSPs, MediaMath and [X+1], did not get back to us.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.