Home Mobile AppLovin Lays Out Its Post-MoPub Acquisition Plans

AppLovin Lays Out Its Post-MoPub Acquisition Plans

SHARE:
AppLovin is in the process of fully integrating MAX and MoPub, which AppLovin bought from Twitter in October for around $1 billion.
integration

App monetization platform AppLovin has all the first-party data it needs, according to CEO Adam Foroughi.

Machine learning does the rest.

Roughly a year ago, AppLovin launched a proprietary machine learning recommendation engine called Axon that uses predictive algorithms to target apps to the users most likely to download them.

“The games business may grow, it may not grow – it doesn’t matter, because it’s scaled enough where it’s fueling the massive growth in the software business,” Foroughi told investors on Wednesday during the company’s Q4 earnings call, its third since going public in April of last year.

Must be fun to be a content fortress.

AppLovin gathers first-party data from its gaming app portfolio, which includes its own homegrown apps and acquired IP from the likes of Machine Zone and Belka Games.

The focus going forward will be “to continue to expand the dollars that third parties are paying us on the software side, whether it’s through MAX or whether it’s through the demand-side relationships we’re going to inherit through MoPub,” Foroughi said.

“We’re not a games company,” he said. “We’re a software company helping our partners grow.”

To the MAX

AppLovin’s suite of software tools for developers include AppDiscovery, MAX and Compass.

AppDiscovery matches advertiser demand with publisher supply powered by Axon. MAX is AppLovin’s in-app bidding software for real-time auctions, and Compass is the analytics tool within MAX.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

AppLovin is in the process of fully integrating MAX and MoPub, which AppLovin bought from Twitter in October for around $1 billion. Since the acquisition, the number of apps monetizing with MAX is up by more than 60% and more than 90% of “the largest publishers” using MoPub are migrating to AppLovin’s unified offering, Foroughi said.

MoPub is a conduit to new demand sources – including new non-gaming demand – through DSPs and bidders that previously didn’t have direct access to MAX publishers, he said. ​The combined platform – MoPub and MAX together – is more than twice as large as MoPub was alone.

Although, as recently as a couple of years ago, no one was doing in-app bidding, Foroughi said, today, roughly half of the transactions on MAX take place programmatically, with the expectation that the vast majority will be through real-time bidding by the end of the year.

“The ad ecosystem should be traded in real time,” Foroughi said. “It’s no different than a stock trading floor.”

Migration migraine

But there’s going to be upheaval for MoPub’s supply partners in the short term. AppLovin’s plan is to shut down MoPub by the end of the first quarter, which is a fairly brief migration period for many publishers.

In its investor letter, AppLovin acknowledges that “migrating to a new mediation solution is a rare event” and that it can be complex, time consuming and have a financial impact on publishers.

Which is why AppLovin says it expects to pay around $200 million total in one-time migration fees to publishers in order to help cover the cost of migrating to MAX.

Historically, in the mediation space, there’s very little volatility, and once people are on a platform, they stay there. Mediation platforms are sticky, said Herald Chen, AppLovin’s CFO.

But with MoPub to be shut down shortly, “a lot of publishers needed to move quickly,” Chen said. “They potentially can lose revenue given the speed with which they need to migrate.”

The financials

AppLovin’s overall revenue for the fourth quarter was up 56% year-over-year to $793 million, while software platform revenue grew 208% over the same period to $247 million.

Even so, AppLovin’s stock dipped during after-hours trading because its revenue forecast for 2022, which the company expects to fall between $3.55 billion and $3.85 billion, came in a little below market expectations.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.