Home Data Aggregate Knowledge Adopts New, BlueKai Server-To-Server Technology For More Efficient Data Management Says VP Bensoussan

Aggregate Knowledge Adopts New, BlueKai Server-To-Server Technology For More Efficient Data Management Says VP Bensoussan

SHARE:

Aggregate Knowledge and BlueKaiAggregate Knowledge announced that it has adopted “BlueKai‘s new server-to-server data transfer technology, which greatly increases the efficiencies in which BlueKai data is transferred and delivered for ad campaign targeting and optimization within the AK Discovery Platform.” Read more.

Pascal Bensoussan, VP of Products at Aggregate Knowledge, an audience management and real-time ad optimization platform, discussed the new alliance and what it means.

AdExchanger.com: How does “server-to-server data transfer technology” work?  Can you compare it to the previous way you were working with BlueKai and show the key differentiators?

PB: The prevalent method for cookie pooling is based on using an image pixel, placed on a web page, to transfer user data.  Pixel capacity limitations (i.e., typically no more than 4 pixels per page) and the inherent time required to “see” qualifying users via their browser result in slow cookie ramp time for advertising campaigns.  Typically a campaign takes 2-4 weeks to ramp up the cookie pool, reaching the most efficient run rate at the end of the campaign.

With server-to-server data transfer, Aggregate Knowledge and BlueKai have created a common ID space allowing BlueKai to transfer qualifying user IDs very quickly once a new campaign is created in the BlueKai user interface.

The results: More data and more users, faster.  Greater privacy controls. More time to test and optimize media buys and creative designs.

Can you quantify the performance improvement that advertisers will see from this type of integration? Or maybe the improvements in potential scale of the campaign?

This type of integration provides an efficient mechanism to scale cookie pools in a matter of days instead of weeks, allowing more time for media channels to deliver those users. Reach improvements can be significant.  Our initial tests suggest that campaigns can reach 2-3X the number of unique users using server-to-server data transfer.

The technology is still relatively new and rapidly evolving.  At this early stage, we have only scraped the surface of what can be done.  Other benefits include (1) audience management scalability and flexibility, (2) faster ramp on biddable inventory, (3) shorter learning, leaving more time for optimized bidding and dynamic ad serving.

Can you see server-to-server technology integration becoming a standard if not a requirement for many data providers?

Server-to-server integration will definitely become the dominant solution to buy more data, faster, and more securely.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Our work with BlueKai is very much a step forward. That been said, a few hurdles are in the way of broader adoption:

  1. Very few data providers have the technology to support server-to-server integration
  2. Advertisers not willing to “spend all their data budget in a matter of days
  3. Few companies have the infrastructure to make this economically worthwhile (i.e. scaling volume faster than operations costs)

By John Ebbert

Must Read

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.