Home Data Agencies: Data Visualization Still ‘More Flash Than Substance’

Agencies: Data Visualization Still ‘More Flash Than Substance’

SHARE:

Data VisualizationAn array of visualization products have emerged to help marketers turn “big data” into smart data.

This week has brought announcements around visualization from the likes of Tag Man, Placeable and SumAll. Meanwhile, plenty of other data and analytics vendors — including Tealium, Adobe, IBM, Acxiom and Domo – are investing in this area.

But while senior agency execs welcome advances in making data actionable, many are unimpressed. They say today’s data viz products commonly confuse accessibility of data and how to make it actionable.

“Everyone wants big data, but when you look at adoption of big data solutions, it’s lacking because agency people aren’t seeing the relevance,” said Elliott Trice, VivaKi’s global experience officer, whose job involves developing the Publicis media operation’s tailored data-visualization products. “A structural shift needs to happen. You need to have a team working with users in various parts of the agency on what their specific needs are.”

One problem is that agency staffers aren’t always clear on what their data needs are, apart from discrete metrics. Few media industry staffers have an MBA in analytics, which would help them parse the data and understand which custom visualization package would benefit them.

The big need now is not so much technological. It’s actually as simple as step-by-step guidance. But that can be costly, and requires trust on the part of agencies with the data analytics providers they employ.

Visualization’s Limited Role

This week, TagMan produced an upgrade to its Visual Insights Suite, which is intended to give brands an “intuitive” look at how their search marketing has led to purchases. Meanwhile, analytics startup SumAll has integrated Foursquare check-ins for its clients, offering to provide a clearer sense of how promotions have been working for restaurants and events. But for the moment, these “improvements” are about making data more quickly readable than actionable, agency executives say.

“The early iterations of data visualization are typically more  flash than substance,” said Michael Dowd, chief technologist for WPP’s GroupM Next, when asked about the kinds of visualization services available. “Dashboards collect a lot of attention, but unless those data visualizations are directly facilitating the implementation of better strategies, they are not particularly valuable to us as marketers. Some marketing concepts are simply too complex to represent cleanly within a dashboard.”

That said, the visualization dashboards capably serve two purposes, Dowd said: representing data for those who are not actively making strategic and tactical decisions, and guiding deeper analysis for those who are.

Dowd said he sees these products as “a supplement to existing marketing strategies, not a replacement. And ultimately, tools like the ones from TagMan, Placeable and SumAll can become an asset to marketers and businesses alike.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Function Over Aesthetics

The main virtue of data visualization is that it helps agency executives and marketers make sense of the reams of spreadsheets and numbers through immediately understood patterns. It’s more than just pie charts, but it doesn’t have to be more complicated than that. But, more than aesthetics, the point is to give structure to vast collections of consumer data from numerous online and offline channels, noted Anna Nicanorova, data scientist at Omnicom’s Annalect. Even though media buying is the flip side of the creative part of the agency,  media plans and results need to be communicated in a narrative fashion.

When choosing a data-visualization provider, Nicanorova said she investigates the functionality of dealing with data, rather than the final visual output.

“A lot of applications will claim that they were created for big data, but under closer examination we constantly find a lot of restrictions on the size, types and file formats,” Nicanorova said. “We always closely examine the back-end infrastructure that handles data ingestion, to make sure that the specific visualization tool provides a proper pipeline to get the data into the application in the first place.

While there is a lot of attention being paid to chart types and what colors to use, Nicanorova said she is noticing more practicality from clients these days. In particular, there is a greater demand for “data interactivity.” In essence, it’s more valuable to have all the information filtered into a single chart, rather than having to sift through a pictorial version of different data sets. The way Nicanorova would like to see the final visualization is through the ability to hover, zoom and filter the visual information she receives.

The big things are control, synthesis and customization.

“A beautiful data visualization that doesn’t help achieve a client’s KPI is nothing more than a pretty screensaver,” she said. “You can’t have an all-encompassing view because it’s going to result in information overload. … If a client is looking to increase ROI and their dashboard isn’t helping them to do that, then they should look for a better solution because quantifiable results are what good data visualizations should provide them.”

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.