Home Data-Driven Thinking The Future Of Google Analytics Is Server-Side – Here’s Why

The Future Of Google Analytics Is Server-Side – Here’s Why

SHARE:
Hugo Loriot, partner at fifty-five

“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media.

Today’s column is written by Hugo Loriot, partner at fifty-five.

The annual Cannes Festival has elevated France’s reputation in advertising and marketing technology over the last several decades. But at this year’s event, France’s stance on data privacy was a notable backdrop. 

Over the past two weeks, Meta lost in court against French ad-tech champion Criteo, and it will now have to grant better access to its inventory. Meanwhile, France’s data protection watchdog, the CNIL, just deemed Google Analytics illegal – a move that the Italian data privacy authority has just followed as well.

What happens now? It turns out there may be a server-side solution. 

Is GA-XIT around the corner?

The CNIL’s recent choice reflects a decision from earlier this year, when the organization found a local website’s use of the tool to be in breach of European Union law. The ruling points to the transfer of personal data – inclusive of but not limited to users’ IP addresses – to the United States, in the absence of a solid replacement to the defunct Privacy Shield.

This comes only one month after Google announced a series of measures to exclusively collect European users’ IP addresses in local servers, redact them before processing the information in the US and provide country-level data-sharing controls to marketers.

Adding to the confusion, the CNIL also recently ruled against Universal Analytics, the legacy version of Google Analytics, which most website owners still use. While Google’s new features are specific to Google Analytics 4 (GA4), there is still much uncertainty around compliance, especially amid recent rulings.

Only France and Italy have officially taken a stance against Google Analytics so far, but we can expect more EU countries to follow. Marketers now face a difficult decision: double-down on Google Analytics, migrate to GA4 and include regulators’ recommendations to handle personal data or preemptively move to a local web-analytics vendor. 

Google Analytics is by far the most popular web analytics technology. There are not many credible alternatives out there. Switching to a new tool takes time and is expensive. Marketers would need to build and implement a new tagging plan, train their teams to use new reporting workspaces, migrate dashboards and lose year-over-year key performance indicator comparisons. Global organizations face a particular challenge: having to maintain a local solution in Europe and operate Google Analytics everywhere else.

The server-side alternative

There is a silver lining. The CNIL has approved server-side implementations of Google Analytics, as long as marketers take responsibility for collecting and obfuscating personal data in Europe.

Browsers collect website page views, events or conversions and send them directly to Google Analytics servers for processing by default. But with a server-side implementation, events can be sent to a marketer’s cloud infrastructure in Europe, anonymized and then routed to Google Analytics servers for processing and visualization.

More than a work-around, moving server-side is becoming a major trend. It gives marketers more control over data for segmentation and attribution as getting users’ consent becomes even trickier. As an example of the growing popularity of moving server-side, Meta has recommended moving retargeting and conversion tags to its server-side tagging CAPI for the past 18 months. 

Still, there are obstacles. Despite its growing prominence, server-side implementations are complex to handle and require working in lockstep with the IT department.

More uncertainty ahead

Privacy regulations aren’t primed to slow down anytime soon. The legal compliance uncertainty around Google Analytics in Europe will likely remain. GA4 with a server-side approach may be the future-proof solution worth betting on for global success.

Follow 55 (@55FiftyFive55) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

For more articles featuring Hugo Loriot, click here.

Must Read

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.