Home AdExchanger Talks The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off

The Privacy-Utility Trade-Off

SHARE:
Graham Mudd, co-founder, Anonym

It’s a false narrative that personalization and privacy can’t coexist.

Businesses will always need to find a compromise between privacy and utility, but it’s more than possible to strike a healthy balance, says Graham Mudd, president and chief product officer at privacy startup Anonym, on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

The challenge is figuring out the most reasonable approach, which is why it’s important to get feedback from lawyers, policymakers and technologists, says Mudd, who co-founded Anonym in early 2022 after more than a decade in executive roles at Meta focusing on measurement, monetization and product marketing for ads.

Mudd’s co-founder is someone many in the ad industry will recognize: Brad Smallwood, who was VP of marketing science at Facebook for more than 12 years.

Anonym’s approach combines privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) with confidential computing in a trusted execution environment – which is a technical way of saying the company uses encrypted data to help advertisers find new customers, connect impressions to conversions and optimize campaigns.

“We don’t create profiles or hold on to that data,” Mudd says. “It flows into our system, we do the compute on it and then we discard it.”

But that’s not the traditional way that ad tech functions. Ad tech relies on data collection.

And one of the main reasons why regulators, including the Federal Trade Commission, have started paying much closer attention to the online advertising industry – which you can see from its recent settlements, enforcement actions and lawsuits – is because it believes data collection is out of control.

“Ad platforms know a lot about what you do on the internet, purely because they want to gather that data for advertising purposes,” Mudd says. “[But in many ways] it doesn’t feel like an even or fair trade-off.”

Also in this episode: How to pronounce “Anonym” (it’s like “anonymous,” but without the “ous”), an insider’s look at how Meta revamped its ads platform after the Cambridge Analytica scandal (and then did it again to manage fallout from Apple’s ATT), the pros and cons of proprietary vs. open source PETs, where ad tech went wrong and Mudd’s firsthand experience testifying before Congress. (Pro tip: Don’t forget to turn on your mic!)

For more articles featuring Graham Mudd, click here.

Must Read

The Trade Desk’s Revenue Growth Stalls As Big Brands Tighten Their Belts

“Our revenue growth is below our expectations and below the standard we hold ourselves to,” The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green told investors.

Comic: Measuremints

Nielsen Is Acquiring DoubleVerify For $2.15 Billion

On Thursday, Nielsen entered into a definitive agreement to acquire DoubleVerify in an all cash transaction valued at approximately $2.15 billion.

WBD Hopes To Buoy Linear TV Long Enough For Streaming To Find Its Way

Warner Bros. Discovery cited softer ad sales growth and the continued decline of linear TV as its reasons for missing investor expectations in Q2. Unsurprisingly, streaming ads are the biggest bright spot on WBD’s earnings report card.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Mobile Freight Train

AppLovin Asks For Patience As It Grows Its Ecommerce And Consumer Ads Business

“We’re deemed a new bucket, so a testing category,” AppLovin CEO told investors regarding its nascent consumer and ecommerce ads business. “And to graduate up takes time. This stuff compounds over quarters and years.”

Magnite Doesn’t Want To Be A DSP. It Just Wants To Own The Decisioning Layer

On Wednesday, Magnite CEO Michael Barrett painted a picture of a company that’s edging into the buy side by adding more DSP-style capabilities for planning and activation.

For Cuisinart, AI-Generated Ads Are As Handy As A Kitchen Blender

Cuisinart’s marketing team has been eager to take advantage of generative AI-based creative.