Home Platforms Facebook Kills Off Third-Party Data For Targeting

Facebook Kills Off Third-Party Data For Targeting

SHARE:

Facebook is going to stop allowing third-party data providers from offering targeting directly on its platform.

The move is a direct reaction to the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

In the past, advertisers could use a feature called partner categories to supplement the targeting they do on Facebook with data from brokers, such as recent purchases or household income – data that Facebook doesn’t easily have access to on its own.

Brokers like Acxiom, Epsilon, Oracle, Experian and TransUnion pull this data from a hodgepodge of external sources, including credit card companies, loyalty programs and retailers.

But, starting Sept. 30, advertisers will no longer have the option to use this data to augment their campaigns. The only data they’ll be able to use for targeting on Facebook is either their own first-party data or the data that Facebook collects itself, such as likes, location data, interest data or search history.

Partner categories were primarily used by businesses that don’t have access to their own customer data to plug into Facebook’s CRM matching solution Custom Audiences.

Advertisers will still be able to use Custom Audiences to find existing customers on Facebook and create lookalike audiences. But without partner categories, any third-party data advertisers will have to come through their direct partnership with a third-party provider.

So a brand can buy data on its own to inform targeting on Facebook – it just can’t get that third-party data through Facebook.

It’s worth noting that Facebook will still work with third-party brokers for measurement purposes, including measuring offline behavior as Facebook does through a partnership with Oracle’s Datalogix.

Although advertisers will likely balk at this curtailment of targeting options, getting rid of partner categories probably won’t change their Facebook buying strategies all that much, considering the volume of data Facebook still has at its disposal for targeting.

Using third-party data to enrich an audience buy is standard operating procedure in the digital ad space. But Facebook is aware that it’s under the microscope.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“This product enables third-party data providers to offer their targeting directly on Facebook,” said Graham Mudd, a product marketing director at Facebook, in a statement. “While this is common industry practice, we believe this step … will help improve people’s privacy on Facebook.”

The move is part of numerous changes Facebook has promised to make to secure its platform. Less data flowing in and out of Facebook means, at least in theory, a more secure experience for users. Facebook has been under enormous pressure following the fallout from Cambridge Analytica to shore up its data protection policies.

Last week, Mark Zuckerberg published a post detailing Facebook’s plans to more systematically audit third-party developers, ban any that misuse personal data and notify affected users of any wrongdoing, including those affected by the Cambridge Analytica debacle.

On Monday, Facebook quietly announced that it’s temporarily blocking new chatbots and apps from launching on its platform while it sorts out its audit process.

Facebook also announced tweaks to its privacy tools on Wednesday that will make it easier for user to access, manage and delete the data that Facebook collects about them.

Must Read

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure to create an isolated computing environment for ad targeting and measurement. It will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.