Home AdExchanger Talks Not All Automated Ad Products Are Alike

Not All Automated Ad Products Are Alike

SHARE:
Nii Ahene, chief strategy officer, Tinuiti

Google’s Performance Max and Meta’s Advantage+ often get tossed into the same bucket.

But there are several important differences between these machine-learning-powered ad-buying tools, says Nii Ahene, chief strategy officer at performance marketing agency Tinuiti, speaking on this episode of AdExchanger Talks. (It’s our final show of 2023, if you can believe it!)

One key difference is how marketers feel about the tools.

When Apple announced its AppTrackingTransparency (ATT) framework in 2020, it was clear that Facebook (this is back when Facebook was still called Facebook) had to rebuild large parts of its advertising platform to deal with signal loss.

ATT essentially severed Facebook’s ability to understand what was happening beyond its own walls. And the brands that relied on it for targeting and campaign measurement were rooting for a fix.

“That was a broken system,” Ahene says. “Facebook needed to figure something else out, and Advantage+ has been a partial savior for clients … and wholly embraced by our clients.”

The challenge with Google’s Performance Max, he says, is that it aggregates multiple types of inventory within one auction, which makes it useful for smaller, less sophisticated advertisers, but aggravating for big brands that want more transparency.

It’s also very challenging to get access via Performance Max to certain desirable inventory types, like YouTube Shorts, outside of alpha or beta programs, Ahene says. (Not to mention that it can also be very challenging to avoid access to certain undesirable inventory types through PMax, as was evidenced by the recent report from Adalytics about Google’s Search Partner Network.)

“It’s causing a lot of consternation and frustration for larger advertisers,” Ahene says. “On Facebook, you still have that level of control … but that’s not the case with the Google properties, and that’s definitely been a point of friction for a lot of our clients.”

Also in this episode: The shiny object that is retail media (and will we ever get retail media network standards?), creative as a performance lever, what will happen to CPMs once third-party cookies are truly no longer available and Ahene’s personal mission to visit every NBA arena in the US.

Must Read

play button with many coins isolated on blue background. The concept of monetization of the video. Making money on video content. minimal style. 3d rendering

Exclusive: Connatix And JW Player Merge To Create A One-Stop Shop For Video Monetization

On Wednesday, video monetization platforms Connatix and JW Player announced plans to merge into a new entity called JWP Connatix. The deal was first rumored in July.

HUMAN Raises $50 Million

HUMAN plans to build a deterministic ID from its tracking of more than 20 trillion digital signals per week across 3 billion devices, which will aid attribution for ecommerce.

Buyers Can Now Target High-Attention Inventory In The Trade Desk

By applying Adelaide’s Attention Unit scoring, buyers can target low-, medium- and high-attention inventory via TTD’s self-serve platform.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Should Advertisers Navigate A TikTok Ban Or Google Breakup? Just Ask Brian Wieser

The online advertising industry is staring down the barrel of not one but two potential shutdowns that could radically change where brands put their ad dollars in 2025, according to Madison and Wall’s Brian Weiser and Olivia Morley.

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.

TikTok Video For Open Web Publishers? Outbrain Built It.

Outbrain is trying to shed its chumbox rep by bringing social media-style vertical video to mobile publishers on the open web.