Home AdExchanger Talks The MRC May Be Old, But It’s Getting With The TV Program

The MRC May Be Old, But It’s Getting With The TV Program

SHARE:

The Media Rating Council (MRC) was born in the ’60s at the behest of Congress during a national media scandal involving TV game shows that rigged quiz results to boost their own ratings.

Fast-forward to 2023, and the MRC’s responsibility to foster fair measurement remains the same. But its techniques and methodologies have evolved, says Ron Pinelli, the MRC’s associate director and SVP of digital research and standards, speaking on this week’s episode of AdExchanger Talks.

“What we’re ultimately trying to provide is assurance that [measurement] services are valid, reliable and effective,” Pinelli says.

But TV’s digitization has introduced many new components the MRC now needs to consider when evaluating media measurement products – in particular, census-level viewership data.

The MRC has had to adapt its accreditation procedures to “keep up to pace with the data and technologies that measurement services are [using],” says Pinelli, pointing to big data and generative AI. One way the MRC is doing this is by working more directly with the engineers that perform the audits.

Ultimately, he says, the MRC needs to understand the inner workings of the data and technology being used to account for ad delivery. That is how it ensures services are dependable and following through on doing what they’ve promised to do.

Because accreditation isn’t one and done. The MRC has to keep an eye on the products it accredits to make sure they remain valid, reliable and effective.

But the organization’s methodology “is not foolproof,” Pinelli says.

Case in point: When Nielsen severely undercounted audiences during the pandemic, the MRC was forced to temporarily strip the company of its accreditation. And that’s the MRC’s process working as it should.

According to Pinelli, the MRC approaches audits in an “open and iterative” way that’s designed to control bias in media measurement through standardization and accreditation.

Also in this episode: A closer look at Nielsen’s and Amazon’s plan to measure Thursday Night Football, the limitations of panels in TV measurement, what determines the speed and cost of audits for MRC accreditation, where the MRC and the wider TV industry butt heads and how the org differs from the newly created joint industry committee of broadcasters.

For more articles featuring Ron Pinelli, click here.

Must Read

VideoAmp Bets On AI To Connect Ad Planning And Measurement

VideoAmp is competing in the measurement space by sharpening its focus on TV audience data, ad performance and, of course, AI. The company is also making strategic hires and promoting from within.

Comic: Header Bidding Rapper (Wrapper!)

Sure, Debates Between Prebid Members Can Get Heated. That’s Why It’s The Programmatic Melting Pot

The Prebid Summit in New York City on Tuesday exceeded the event’s reputation for liveliness.

Has The Ad Industry Lost The Pulse Of American Consumers?

The ad industry has become a community of people who say things like “This is going to sound relatable” and follow it up with a sentence that may as well be Martian to 99% of America.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

LG And Magnite Launch Agentic Home Screen Ads With A Winning NFL Quarterback

LG home screen inventory is now available through agentic buying, opening up a premium TV placement to faster, more automated campaign setup.

Prebid’s Proposed Auction Overhaul Would Do What The Court Wouldn’t: Separate AdX From GAM

Reorienting the ad auction so that ad servers bid into Prebid lets publishers access demand from Google AdX without also having to use Google’s ad server.

Meet Starling, The Startup That Says It’s More Than Just Another CTV SSP

Starling recently launched as a connected TV SSP and wants to capitalize on the opportunity to address a major pain point facing CTV marketers: the lack of show-level data.