Home Ad Exchange News Apple’s iAd Builds Attribution Support, But Lags Behind Facebook

Apple’s iAd Builds Attribution Support, But Lags Behind Facebook

SHARE:

iad-attributionApple has been slow to improve its offerings around mobile app installs, but it’s showing signs of life. Last week, the company issued its first clear signal that its Identifier for Advertising (IDFA) can be used as an attribution tool.

But what about its own mobile ad product, a.k.a. iAd? The company has been more active there as well, though plenty of work remains to be done if it aims to compete with the undisputed leader among mobile supply networks: Facebook.

Ten days ago, Apple began offering an attribution mechanism that app developers can use to attribute credit for app installs back to iAd impressions. It was the first time iAd had offered any way to link ads to app conversions — an acknowledgement that being able to promote your app is only useful if a mobile developer could guess which impression ultimately drove the install or post-install action. Mobile ad companies have welcomed the development.

However, Apple’s solution is far more basic than Facebook’s, offering only a binary “yes/no” indication of whether an iOS device was previously served an ad through the iAd network. By contrast, Facebook’s mobile measurement program passes a great deal more information in its attribution flag – including time stamp and campaign name.

“Sure, it’s a good start,” Apsalar CEO Michael Oiknine said of the iAd offering. But he said the “last click” attribution method still dominant in the app install world can’t be applied, and optimization is next to impossible given the lack of data.

This is a surprise when one considers Apple’s early advantage in mobile advertising. It acquired Quattro Wireless in 2010, and Facebook’s own measurement system didn’t appear until two years later.

However since then, Facebook’s early work around mobile measurement, and its huge supply volume, have created a big lead. According to eMarketer data from February 2014, Facebook captures four times more mobile display ad spend:

emarketer-fb-iad

Oiknine says Apsalar’s own numbers suggest iAd’s share of spend is even lower than eMarketer estimates– down below 5%.

“Apple’s attribution approach… will not help them narrow the gap,” he said.

But iAd has the upper hand over Facebook in at least one area: data sharing. Advertisers can combine iAd attribution data with in-app performance data, notes Slaven Radic, CEO of TapStream. He says this gives “more color” around the total impact of mobile advertising, but it’s a no-no for Facebook mobile advertisers.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Facebook has long frowned on the mingling of its data with outside marketing systems, among other practices, and is serious about enforcing restrictions. In February it expelled from its measurement program two companies who were found to have violated data collection policies.

“With iAd, at least we can tell advertisers what kind of engagement they’re getting,” Radic said. “Facebook doesn’t like to share this data far downstream. You’re very limited in what you can do with it.”

Apple did not respond to a request for comment.

Must Read

The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

The DOJ And Google Sharpen Their Remedy Proposals As The Two Sides Prepare For Closing Arguments

The phrase “caution is key” has become a totem of the new age in US antitrust regulation. It was cited this week by both the DOJ and Google in support of opposing views on a possible divestiture of Google’s sell-side ad exchange.

create a network of points with nodes and connections, plain white background; use variations of green and grey for the dots and the connctions; 85% empty space

Alt Identity Provider ID5 Buys TrueData, Marking Its First-Ever Acquisition

ID5 bought TrueData mainly to tackle what ID5 CEO Mathieu Roche calls the “massive fragmentation” of digital identity, which is a problem on the user side and the provider side.

CTV Manufacturers Have A New Tool For Catching Spoofed Devices

The IAB Tech Lab’s new device attestation feature for its Open Measurement SDK provides a scaled way for original device manufacturers to confirm that ad impressions are associated with real devices.