Home The Sell Sider Publishers That Haven’t Adopted Ads.txt Are Losing Money

Publishers That Haven’t Adopted Ads.txt Are Losing Money

SHARE:

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Matt Harada, general manager of data at Sovrn.

Publishers without an updated Ads.txt file are missing out on revenue and stand to lose more in the near future.

Despite strong initial adoption of Ads.txt following its release, I get the sense that the rate has stalled in recent months. In the last quarter, some publishers have continued to hold out ­– and their bottom lines are suffering as a result.

Publishers need to know that Ads.txt is an opportunity, not a liability. Ads.txt offers the potential for improved relationships with advertisers, enhanced ad experiences for audiences and, ultimately, improved revenue. Advertisers have fully embraced the benefits of Ads.txt, and many have said they will no longer buy inventory without an updated file by the end of the year. And Google will default to Ads.txt-authorized-only buying as the default option on its Display and Video 360 platform by end of 2018.

So if publishers haven’t already, here’s why they need to implement Ads.txt – and keep it updated – as soon as possible.

It’s important for publishers of all sizes

Ads.txt is just as important to small publishers as it is to industry giants.

Large sites have benefited from Ads.txt in part because it has forced bad actors downstream to smaller publishers. It’s therefore crucial that small publishers – which seem the most reticent to adopt Ads.txt – protect themselves, and not just for their own sake. Establishing and maintaining industry standards requires both supply-chain transparency and industrywide adoption.

Ads.txt attracts advertisers

Demand-side platforms (DSPs) have been giving preferential treatment to exchanges included in Ads.txt files for more than a year, which means publishers that haven’t stayed up to date are missing out on spend.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

This won’t change. When buyers stop bidding completely on inventory without an Ads.txt file, these publishers will be excluded from programmatic spend regardless of whether their sites are being spoofed.

Implementation is easy

Implementing Ads.txt offers the best return on investment a publisher will get.

Exchanges will help publishers implement Ads.txt. If publishers ask, exchanges should provide the necessary Ads.txt line items, if they haven’t already. Uploading what they send is as easy as copying and pasting.

Once publishers have adopted Ads.txt, they’ll need to keep it updated. Accuracy is crucial. Publishers must take the time to maintain their file or they may as well not have one at all.  Mistransposing a digit from a tag ID or adding www. to a file can interfere with authorization, resulting in unsold impressions or inventory sold for less than the highest bid.

The minimal effort of implementing and updating is well worth the yield protection that will be earned. Publishers should make a calendar note to update monthly or, at worst, quarterly, and use online Ads.txt file checkers to ensure they have not made any mistakes.

It won’t make a site ‘ugly’

It’s true that some Ads.txt files get pretty big, and that there are many reseller line items for many exchanges. However, the robots that crawl the web looking for these files just want to tell a publisher’s DSP how they can legitimately buy its inventory — they’re not worried about aesthetics. Publishers shouldn’t be afraid to include additional information that might help them.

Even reseller lines drive incremental revenue to a site. The advertiser-DSP ecosystem is far from efficient, and including this information in an Ads.txt file can lead to opportunities that might not otherwise reach a publisher directly. That can be true even in the case of reseller exchanges they already work with.

There’s no downside

Transparency and trust are two of the most important factors in ad tech relationships, and fighting fraud is at the top of every advertiser’s list of goals. A publisher showing that it is on board with the latest protective measures makes its inventory more attractive, leads to increased opportunities for revenue and ensures it is well-positioned to take advantage of changes to the industry landscape.

Ad tech is constantly evolving, and Ads.txt is a big step forward. It’s time for hesitant publishers to take advantage of the Ads.txt framework and pursue the new partnerships and opportunities it brings.

Follow Sovrn (@sovrnholdings) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.