Home Privacy Facebook’s Clear History Feature May Mess With Its Targeting Options

Facebook’s Clear History Feature May Mess With Its Targeting Options

SHARE:

Facebook says it’s finally going to start rolling out its long-overdue Clear History feature “in the coming months.”

That activation means Facebook will have less access to certain forms of targeting data.

On Tuesday, Facebook warned advertisers that the tool, which will eventually give people the ability to see and delete the data that third-party sites and apps share about them with Facebook, could impact targeting on Facebook properties.

Although Facebook claims that the Clear History rollout shouldn’t affect its measurement and analytics tools, certain targeting options on Facebook are powered by developer tools, like Facebook’s SDK and API, or by the Facebook pixel, which advertisers use to track the off-platform performance of their Facebook ads.

These business tools, the Facebook Like button and other widgets embedded on thousands of sites across the internet all send data from third parties back to the Facebook mothership, including what people clicked on and the sites they visited.

Custom Audiences, for example, relies in part on data related to visits people make to an advertiser’s website or app.

But when users clear their history – telling Facebook to remove all off-Facebook activity from their account – that data is no longer available to Facebook for targeting purposes.

“Businesses should keep this in mind when developing strategies for these kinds of campaigns in the second half of the year and beyond,” Facebook advised rather vaguely in a blog post that raises more questions than it answers.

Is a Clear History opt out persistent or do people have to periodically clear their histories? Why isn’t off-platform data sharing with Facebook opt in rather than opt out? How much off-platform activity will Facebook lose out on if a preponderance of people decide to clear their histories? Where in the settings will people be able to access the feature? Will non-Facebook users be able to delete data about themselves that Facebook may have collected for security purposes?

Details are thin on the ground as to how the feature will function, but Facebook’s proactive warning that advertisers might need to redo their targeting strategies indicates Clear History is actually coming soon, or at least at some point this year.

Facebook first teased Clear History way back in May 2018 at its F8 developer’s conference when Mark Zuckerberg promised a user-friendly tool that would allow users to delete their non-Facebook browsing history and disassociate it from their Facebook accounts as easily as they’re able to clear their cookies.

But Zuckerberg couldn’t resist a little dig.

“When you clear your cookies in a browser, it can make parts of your experience worse or you may have to sign back in to dozens of websites, you may have to reconfigure some things, and the same is going to be true here – or your Facebook won’t be quite as good while it relearns your preferences,” he told developers in 2018. “But after going through our systems, this is the kind of control we think people should have, [and] so we’re building this.”

But whether a feature like Clear History is enough to appease lawmakers in DC, where criticism of large technology platforms is mounting daily – that’s another matter.

In a strongly-worded letter addressed to Mark Zuckerberg on Monday, Sen. Josh Hawley, R-MO, expressed much skepticism over Facebook’s plans for a “privacy-first future,” which was the main theme of Zuck’s keynote at F8 this year.

“Facebook knows when its users are interfacing with its messaging products and it knows through browser cookies and integration with publisher websites when users have clicked links to read articles,” Hawley wrote. “What features you offer to allow erasure of ‘off platform’ web activity are off by default – a strange design decision for a privacy-focused platforms.”

Must Read

CIMM Is Out To Prove That All Media Isn’t Equal

An upcoming paper from CIMM doesn’t just demonstrate that differences in media quality can be measured. It also argues that tying media value to short-term outcomes has perpetuated longstanding industry challenges.

TikTok On Why Brands Can’t Buy Its New Ad Formats Programmatically

Not unlike last year, the mood during TikTok’s NewFronts presentation last week felt like cautious optimism, if not outright relief.

Meta’s NewFronts Message To Advertisers: Embrace The Noise

Can a good sales presentation offset the impact of a very bad news week? That’s a question for Meta, which collected two guilty verdicts in court this week for failing to protect children and creating additive products.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

AI Helps Manscaped Trim Social Chatter Down To The Bare Essentials

Meet Clamor, a new social listening product that pulls cultural insights from online conversations in real time. Clamor helped Manscaped freshen up its marketing, including for this year’s Super Bowl.

A man talking to a robot

How Red Roof Is Bringing In More Customers With Zeta’s Voice-Activated AI Agent

Hotel chain Red Roof is using Zeta’s new voice-activated AI agent to guide its campaign creation, deployment timing and audience development.

Jean-Paul Schmetz, Chief of Ads, Brave

Why Ad-Blocking Browser Brave Introduced Its Own Ads

Brave’s chief of ads Jean-Paul Schmetz on competition in the search and browser markets, the fallout from the Google Search antitrust ruling and whether AI search will help smaller upstarts compete with Big Tech.