Home Platforms The Trade Desk Makes Good On Threats To Block Yahoo’s Video Ads

The Trade Desk Makes Good On Threats To Block Yahoo’s Video Ads

SHARE:
Comic: Video Scarcity

The Trade Desk has closed the spigot on a deluge of video inventory it says is mislabeled by Yahoo as in-stream ad units.

As of Monday this week, The Trade Desk (TTD) has already disabled access to all of Yahoo’s video inventory for open-auction bidding, according to an agency source that asked to remain anonymous.

TTD had threatened to do so, as Adweek reported a week ago.

TTD confirmed to AdExchanger that it had removed support for at least some of the online video inventory sold by Yahoo as a publisher.

However, a company spokesperson declined to offer more specifics about the scope of the shutdown, citing the fact that many people with knowledge of the situation are currently traveling back from the Cannes Lions event in France.

“We continue to work with our publishing partners to adhere to industry standards,” TTD’s spokesperson said. “After informing clients we would be blocking incorrectly declared inventory, we have been working with Yahoo and expect resolution soon.”

Deadline disagreements

TTD previously said it would demonetize Yahoo’s video inventory across all open market and library deals by June 17 if Yahoo didn’t take steps to accurately label inventory within its platform. And it seems TTD is holding that line in the sand.

TTD added, according to earlier reports, that it would extend the ban to include all Yahoo video inventory included in private marketplace deals if Yahoo did not correct its labeling practices by July.

Yahoo confirmed it is collaborating with TTD on a solution. But it was less charitable in describing the DSP’s motivations and the timing of the deadlines imposed on Yahoo.

“The timing of this deadline, coinciding with the kickoff and wrap-up of Cannes, appears to be an arbitrary and publicity-seeking effort by The Trade Desk at Yahoo’s expense, especially given the incredibly low amount of revenue this represents for both companies,” said Erin Miller, VP of corporate communications at Yahoo, in a statement.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“We are still in negotiations and intend to make business decisions on a timeline that allows us to do what’s right for our clients, partners and business,” she wrote. “In addition, we are aware that TTD turned off open market spend, but we have not seen a change in spend from advertisers this week.”

What’s instream, anyway?

TTD claims Yahoo, in its capacity as a publisher, consistently mislabels its video inventory as instream and has failed to rectify this misclassification.

It isn’t an entirely new problem. The disagreement over how Yahoo classifies its video formats is the latest example of wider disagreements between buyers and sellers over what constitutes “instream” video and what distinguishes it from less desirable “outstream” placements.

Last March, the IAB Tech Lab published new standards for classifying instream video. As a general rule, these standards define instream video as content the user arrives on the page expecting to watch, with the user having selected it to play and the video playing with sound on by default. Industry experts tend to describe this type of video experience as “YouTube-like.”

In contrast, what most buyers would consider “outstream” now falls into one of three buckets defined by the IAB Tech Lab: accompanying content, interstitial or no content/standalone.

Publishers are incentivized to mislabel inventory as instream because those placements attract much higher CPMs than outstream units. In reality, that so-called instream video ad might monetize a video that autoplays on the page but may or may not be related to the on-page content. Nobody came to the URL to watch that video.

According to the anonymous agency source that spoke to AdExchanger, fewer than 1% of online video ad impressions sold by Yahoo as a publisher played with the sound on. That would mean nearly all of Yahoo’s video inventory would not adhere to the IAB Tech Lab’s new definition of instream.

Both TTD and Yahoo have confirmed in prior media reports that they’re working on fixing the misclassification issue. But neither company has provided clarity on what changes need to be made, the timeline for implementing those changes or when access to Yahoo’s inventory will be restored in TTD’s platform.

AdExchanger will update this story as more information becomes available.

Must Read

To Reduce The Ad Tech Tax, Sovrn Expands Its SaaS Pricing Model

Sovrn is now offering its header bidding managed service, dubbed Ad Management, as self-serve software for a flat CPM fee.

play button with many coins isolated on blue background. The concept of monetization of the video. Making money on video content. minimal style. 3d rendering

Exclusive: Connatix And JW Player Merge To Create A One-Stop Shop For Video Monetization

On Wednesday, video monetization platforms Connatix and JW Player announced plans to merge into a new entity called JWP Connatix. The deal was first rumored in July.

HUMAN Raises $50 Million

HUMAN plans to build a deterministic ID from its tracking of more than 20 trillion digital signals per week across 3 billion devices, which will aid attribution for ecommerce.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Buyers Can Now Target High-Attention Inventory In The Trade Desk

By applying Adelaide’s Attention Unit scoring, buyers can target low-, medium- and high-attention inventory via TTD’s self-serve platform.

How Should Advertisers Navigate A TikTok Ban Or Google Breakup? Just Ask Brian Wieser

The online advertising industry is staring down the barrel of not one but two potential shutdowns that could radically change where brands put their ad dollars in 2025, according to Madison and Wall’s Brian Weiser and Olivia Morley.

Intent IQ Has Patents For Ad Tech’s Most Basic Functions – And It’s Not Afraid To Use Them

An unusual dilemma has programmatic vendors and ad tech platforms worried about a flurry of potential patent infringement suits.