Home Online Advertising Two Senators Just Noticed That Digital Ad Fraud Is Happening And They Want The FTC To Investigate

Two Senators Just Noticed That Digital Ad Fraud Is Happening And They Want The FTC To Investigate

SHARE:

WarnerSchumerCongress is starting to pay attention to ad fraud – and it’s looking to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for answers.

To be precise, Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) drafted a letter to the FTC on Monday calling for the commission to take a closer look at the negative economic impact of digital advertising fraud on consumers and advertisers.

While ad fraud is more of a business problem rather than a consumer issue, and the FTC’s remit is to protect consumers, the senators contend that ad fraud unchecked will trigger a rise in wasted marketing costs that will eventually get passed down to the consumer in the form of higher prices for goods and services.

Although malicious ads drop malware that co-opt consumers’ computers, advertisers are the ones getting gouged by about $7.2 billion in 2016 alone, according to a study released in January by the Association of National Advertisers with help from White Ops.

Mike Zaneis, president and CEO of the Trustworthy Accountability Group, a fraud-fighting coalition of industry trade bodies, acknowledged that the consumer connection is a little tenuous. Although TAG has met with senior officials at the FTC to talk about its efforts, “I have to admit, it was not our primary agency of concentration.”

“But it’s an agency,” he said. “And the fact that ad fraud is becoming a topic for members of Congress for the first time raises the overall level of awareness.”

And publicity is a good thing, even in the slowdown before the summer recess.

Which is to say it’s pretty unlikely that the senators’ letter will result in any sort of consumer protection legislation.

“It would be very difficult to wrap this in any type of bill,” Zaneis said. “The FTC doesn’t go after an industry that’s being victimized when they’re making a strong effort to combat the problem.”

What the letter does do is ask a lot of questions: Is the FTC noticing more of one type of fraud than another? What’s the projected economic impact of data and revenue leakage? What’s the FTC doing to protect consumer data? What steps can be taken to reform opaque advertising exchanges? Is there a regulatory agency that provides oversight of mobile ad platforms?

In answer to that last question: yes, the FTC. But it has only ever enforced an egregious violation of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act. In late June, the FTC levied a $4 million fine against mobile ad network inMobi (which was reduced to $950,000 due to inMobi’s “financial condition”) for tracking the location of hundreds of millions of consumers, including children, without their consent.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But that’s a very different case than drafting legislation to protect consumers from the downstream effects of malware designed to populate botnets that suck advertisers dry.

Regardless, it’s significant in and of itself that lawmakers are taking an interest in ad fraud, although, according to Zaneis, relationships with national and international law enforcement agencies like the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security and Interpol have the best chance of stamping out the problem.

The letter cites a recent report from the World Federation of Advertisers that points to bot traffic as the second-largest market for criminal organizations, just behind drug trafficking.

Which is why something has to be done, although it’s unlikely the FTC will be the one to do it.

“Every dollar that doesn’t go to the companies creating the media that consumers and advertisers both value will ultimately be a loss for consumers,” said Jason Kint, CEO of publisher trade org Digital Content Next. “Many in the industry recognize this and have begun to work on solutions. A good outcome would be this letter inspiring more attention to solutions outside of Washington.”

Warner didn’t respond in time for publication, and Schumer declined to comment.

Must Read

It’s Open Season On SaaS As Brands Confront Their Own Subscription Fatigue

For CFOs and CEOs, we’ve entered a kind of open hunting season on martech SaaS.

Brian Lesser Is The New Global CEO Of GroupM

If you were wondering whether Brian Lesser was planning to take some time off after handing the CEO reins of InfoSum to Lauren Wetzel last week – here’s your answer.

Comic: S.P. O'Middleman's

TripleLift CEO Dave Clark Abruptly Exits After Setting The SSP On A New Trajectory

Dave Clark, who’s led TripleLift for the past two years, is stepping down, effective immediately, and is being replaced by a coterie of TripleLifters.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
shopping cart

Moloco Invests In Its Competitor Topsort As The Retail Media Stakes Go Up

Topsort can lean into Moloco’s algorithmic personalization, while Moloco benefits from Topsort’s footprint with local retailers in the US and in Latin America.

CDP BlueConic Acquires First-Party Data Collection Startup Jebbit

On Wednesday, customer data platform BlueConic bought Jebbit, which creates quizzes, surveys and other interactive online plugs for collecting data from customers.

Comic: The Showdown (Google vs. DOJ)

The DOJ’s Witness List For The Google Antitrust Trial Is A Who’s Who Of Advertising

The DOJ published the witness list for its upcoming antitrust trial against Google, and it reads like the online advertising industry’s answer to the Social Register.