Home Online Advertising The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green On Juggling Brands, Agencies And Investors

The Trade Desk CEO Jeff Green On Juggling Brands, Agencies And Investors

SHARE:

The Trade Desk first picked up steam in the market around five years ago positioning itself as a pure-play agency toolkit.

It won business at the expense of earlier DSPs, such as Turn and TubeMogul, that had frosted their agency relationships by going directly to brands. Now the company is plotting its course as the DSP space is buffeted by new industry pressures, like brand insourcing and publisher header bidding.

So far, so good. When the Trade Desk IPO’d last September, it beat its projected share price of about $17 and traded at around $30. Friday the company stock cleared $50 for the first time after an earnings report Thursday that raised revenue forecasts for 2017 by more than $20 million.

AdExchanger caught up with founder and CEO Jeff Green about some of the Trade Desk’s growth drivers and the pressures placed on an ad tech company by Wall Street.

AdExchanger: People think of The Trade Desk as an agency solution. Yet, last week you won the Proctor & Gamble account, and during Thursday’s earnings call you alluded to other brand wins.

JEFF GREEN: This topic is interesting, as it relates to the P&G announcement and our success in Q1. There’s a trend that often gets described as brands insourcing and taking over media themselves, and I don’t think that’s typically true.

What’s happening is brands are recognizing they want a closer relationship with technology partners, but they still want agencies to manage those. We are getting closer to brands, but only through their agencies, and in all cases, we’re suggesting the brand leverage the breadth and scale of the agency.

How do those new multi-stakeholder relationships tend to come about?

They can arrive in all forms. We get inbounds from brands sometimes and then we bring in the agency. Or the agency comes to us because of what we can add to their pitch. Sometimes the brand definitely goes to the agency and says, “We want to talk to them.”

We’re benefiting now from the trust we’ve developed with agencies over years. It’s mostly within the ad tech community where people say, “Oh, wow, you’re working directly with the brand,” and then we have to clarify.

The Trade Desk is based in Ventura, Calif. Do you feel separate from a New York ad tech community that collaborates to create startup angel investment opportunities or programmatic consortiums?

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

We try not to get caught up in just the noise that too often exists in the ad tech community.

There are a lot of industry initiatives that are worthy of support. I’m super intrigued by that consortium, for instance. I think it’s a very interesting prospect. So, we’re certainly in those kinds of discussions, but we’re not afraid to be different and it as an advantage that there’s a degree of independence.

In a previous call you discussed The Trade Desk’s take rate, which has been a hot-button topic for public ad tech companies. Are those margins changing?

We’ve told the street and shareholders that our margins will be between 15% and 20%. We don’t expect that to change for as far as we can see into the future.

We disclose our take rate and gross revenue figures annually, but not on a quarterly basis. We don’t want to alarm investors or clients, because it does bounce around quite a bit based on who we’re working with, the quarter or the geography. In Q1, for example, we typically have a higher take rate because we offer better discounts –lower margins for ourselves – on quantity, and the biggest buys come later in the year.

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.