Home Online Advertising Google Rolls Out Cross-Device Targeting, In-Store Attribution And TV Measurement

Google Rolls Out Cross-Device Targeting, In-Store Attribution And TV Measurement

SHARE:

google-updatesCross-device targeting and foot traffic attribution and TV, oh my!

Google revealed three products Monday in a blog post. Here’s the low-down.

Precise Cross-Device

When Google earnestly made its cross-device play last year, it was for measurement and optimization only.

No longer.

Cross-device remarketing for Google Display Network and DoubleClick Bid Manager lets marketers actually target across devices using – that’s right – Google deterministic data. This is Google’s bid to take on Facebook’s cross-device strength from the social network’s enormous base of always-logged-in users.

Google seems to be bracing for the privacy outcry that inevitably accompanies all data-related announcements. The company emphasized that consumers must opt in to allow advertisers to target them across devices.

Meanwhile for advertisers, Google stressed the ability to sequence ads and cap frequency to control how often a consumer sees a message. Previously, that function required desktop cookies and Android IDs, so it couldn’t actually be done across screens.

Location, Location

Google also introduced a way to tie store visits to display ads quickly – in about two days.

Location extension places key business information like address, maps and images into mobile display units. Google can also tell marketers whether those ads led to foot traffic by harnessing Google Maps technology.

It claims to be 99% accurate, based on a panel of 5 million global users. Google is really touting that accuracy rate, plus the ability for an advertiser to get data in two days. In a white paper, Google noted that other methods of determining store visitations – such as panels and onboarding offline data – are slow and inaccurate.

This isn’t the first time Google has used its maps to measure in-store visits, though the capability was restricted to search and AdWords. The difference now is that location extension and store visit measurement is available on programmatic display, across Google’s web and app ecosystem.

Incidentally, the location extension ad units shouldn’t be confused with Google shopping ads, formerly known as Product Listing Ads. While shopping ads also have store location data, they’re focused on specific products. As such, shopping ads also might have info around offers and available inventory.

Location extension by contrast is devoted to retail store locations as opposed to a product.

Early adapters of the product include Nissan UK, Jerome’s Furniture, Sprint and Home Depot – the case study for which is available here.

TV Time

Google has extended Brand Lift to TV, which used to only be available for online video or display activations. Now, marketers can measure the impact of their TV campaigns on metrics like brand recall and consideration.

This isn’t Google’s first stab at TV measurement. The Google Attribution 360 product (formerly Adometry) already determined how web actions such as search queries impact TV performance.

Google Brand Lift for TV takes the product one step further by enabling control tests that can, for example, compare how YouTube performs versus TV commercials.

Google is integrating with market research companies – names undisclosed – at an API level to enable that capability.

Google claims advertisers can see how their ads performed on networks or programs. For instance, advertisers can see how many searches resulted from a TV or YouTube placement.

In early beta tests with brands like Volkswagen, Google (unsurprisingly) found that YouTube ads generated twice the number of searches per video impression than TV ads.

Google claims brands are mostly using Brand Lift for TV to gauge actions that occur earlier in the funnel, such as search.

 Kelly Liyakasa contributed

Tagged in:

Must Read

Omnicom Investors Cheer IPG Sell-Off, Despite Weak Ad Spend In Q2

Omnicom is halfway through a major sell-off of IPG agencies. Its future looks healthier as it prunes lower-growth firms, including eliminating certain specialist firms and overlapping agencies in certain countries.

Hundreds of emails, depositions and other documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google antitrust trial, providing a fascinating look at how Google talked about its own products when no one else was watching – especially tools to counteract the rise of header bidding.

Why PubMatic Ditched Its Prebid Web Wrapper, But Never Its SDK

Earlier this month, PubMatic shelved its Prebid integration wrapper, known as OpenWrap Web, and announced it would begin recommending Playwire as an offloading-onboarding partner for the 250-odd publishers that use its wrapper.

Gareth Glaser, Co-Founder & CEO, Gamera

Google’s Buyer Direct Could Beat Agentic Ad Tech At Its Own Game

Agentic AI shows promise for direct deals. But if Google has its way, Buyer Direct could put an end to all sorts of agentic direct sales opportunities while they’re still in the cradle.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

How Warner Bros. Discovery Is Creating Value Out Of Dead Air With Pause Ads

Streaming publishers are banking on pause ads to bolster revenue with a more user-friendly ad experience. With programmatic standardization still pending, Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a stab at advancing the capabilities behind its own pause ad formats.

Peacock Hits Profitability As Comcast Prepares To Spin Off NBCU

Peacock hit what Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh called “meaningful profitability” for the first time in Q2, just as Comcast decided to let it leave the nest. 

Comic: It's Coming For You

Programmatic Platforms Champion Transparency, But Not If It Means Giving Activists Access

A DSP refused to give ad industry watchdog Check My Ads a seat on its platform, even after both parties cosigned a master service agreement, citing concerns about “protections” for “vendor and supply partners.”