Home Online Advertising Google Rolls Out Cross-Device Targeting, In-Store Attribution And TV Measurement

Google Rolls Out Cross-Device Targeting, In-Store Attribution And TV Measurement

SHARE:

google-updatesCross-device targeting and foot traffic attribution and TV, oh my!

Google revealed three products Monday in a blog post. Here’s the low-down.

Precise Cross-Device

When Google earnestly made its cross-device play last year, it was for measurement and optimization only.

No longer.

Cross-device remarketing for Google Display Network and DoubleClick Bid Manager lets marketers actually target across devices using – that’s right – Google deterministic data. This is Google’s bid to take on Facebook’s cross-device strength from the social network’s enormous base of always-logged-in users.


Google seems to be bracing for the privacy outcry that inevitably accompanies all data-related announcements. The company emphasized that consumers must opt in to allow advertisers to target them across devices.

Meanwhile for advertisers, Google stressed the ability to sequence ads and cap frequency to control how often a consumer sees a message. Previously, that function required desktop cookies and Android IDs, so it couldn’t actually be done across screens.

Location, Location

Google also introduced a way to tie store visits to display ads quickly – in about two days.

Location extension places key business information like address, maps and images into mobile display units. Google can also tell marketers whether those ads led to foot traffic by harnessing Google Maps technology.

It claims to be 99% accurate, based on a panel of 5 million global users. Google is really touting that accuracy rate, plus the ability for an advertiser to get data in two days. In a white paper, Google noted that other methods of determining store visitations – such as panels and onboarding offline data – are slow and inaccurate.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

This isn’t the first time Google has used its maps to measure in-store visits, though the capability was restricted to search and AdWords. The difference now is that location extension and store visit measurement is available on programmatic display, across Google’s web and app ecosystem.

Incidentally, the location extension ad units shouldn’t be confused with Google shopping ads, formerly known as Product Listing Ads. While shopping ads also have store location data, they’re focused on specific products. As such, shopping ads also might have info around offers and available inventory.

Location extension by contrast is devoted to retail store locations as opposed to a product.

Early adapters of the product include Nissan UK, Jerome’s Furniture, Sprint and Home Depot – the case study for which is available here.

TV Time

Google has extended Brand Lift to TV, which used to only be available for online video or display activations. Now, marketers can measure the impact of their TV campaigns on metrics like brand recall and consideration.

This isn’t Google’s first stab at TV measurement. The Google Attribution 360 product (formerly Adometry) already determined how web actions such as search queries impact TV performance.

Google Brand Lift for TV takes the product one step further by enabling control tests that can, for example, compare how YouTube performs versus TV commercials.

Google is integrating with market research companies – names undisclosed – at an API level to enable that capability.

Google claims advertisers can see how their ads performed on networks or programs. For instance, advertisers can see how many searches resulted from a TV or YouTube placement.

In early beta tests with brands like Volkswagen, Google (unsurprisingly) found that YouTube ads generated twice the number of searches per video impression than TV ads.

Google claims brands are mostly using Brand Lift for TV to gauge actions that occur earlier in the funnel, such as search.

 Kelly Liyakasa contributed

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.