Home On TV & Video Content, Not IP Addresses, Should Be The Focus Of CTV Targeting

Content, Not IP Addresses, Should Be The Focus Of CTV Targeting

SHARE:

Like third-party cookies for the programmatic advertising ecosystem, IP addresses have become the ad targeting currency of choice for the $26 billion CTV ad market.

But like their cookie cousins, IP addresses face an uncertain future. Increasingly tough and evolving data privacy standards are making personal information like IP addresses incrementally more difficult to use. Yet the industry seems stumped for an alternative to its chosen CTV default.

Universal IDs, allowing ad tech companies to identify users across different websites and devices (including CTVs), is one potential alternative. But the fragmentation of universal IDs, as well as the lack of standardization and interoperability, means an effective model for CTV targeting could be years away.

Content metadata is another option that offers a more viable model – one that moves the ad sphere away from its infatuation with audience targeting and into a rich new ecosystem of precision and nuance. Whether that shift can take shape, however, all depends on the industry working together to analyze and share vast quantities of content-level insights.

IP tracking: a house of cards?

The industry’s overreliance on IPs seems more of a stumble than a calculated move. Excited to make the most of CTV’s booming riches, advertisers haven’t had time to consider the mechanism’s obvious shelf life.

While IP addresses are enough of a blurred line to avoid being banned outright, it’s a fantasy to assume they won’t soon fall foul of global data privacy laws. In fact, Big Tech is already preemptively preparing for these restrictions. Apple, Microsoft and Google have all unveiled various forms of IP blocking or cloaking measures in recent months, while CTV publishers are also getting spooked.

Meanwhile, privacy-compliant solutions, such as The Trade Desk’s Unified ID 2.0, need user consent to work. The upshot? CTV advertising is poleaxed between two approaches, one which is vulnerable to privacy crackdowns and another that may not scale.

IP tracking has another headache, too. Research shows that over 50% of CTV consumers aged 25-54 are co-viewers who watch TV with at least one other person in the room. This figure rises to 70% for upcoming generations, and viewership fragments further across multiple variables, including where and when particular CTV content is consumed. 

So, while an IP address can piece together consumer information across multiple devices, it cannot take into account the myriad of CTV users who fall under the umbrella of one household. The same drawback prompts serious questions around brand safety, too.

The case for content metadata

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Perhaps any form of audience identifier – whether that’s the devices people use, whom they watch with or if they give consent for data sharing – is a red herring for advertisers. Instead, we should be zeroing in on the content itself.

If we have a granular understanding of what CTV audiences are watching at any one moment in time, the need for any other information fades away.

At the moment, players across the CTV space operate via property-level content metadata, such as the title or genre of a show. The next frontier involves breaking down CTV content on a scene-by-scene basis, creating a much richer ecosystem of metadata tags and providing a powerful and brand-safe currency for CTV ad targeting. Imagine being able to align ads with relevant moments in a cult hit show like Hulu’s “The Bear,” for example, while skipping scenes of violence or drug use.

The fact that so many large publishers still don’t properly tag and pass metadata into the bidstream will have to be addressed. But industry-led regulation and standardization will hopefully ease this problem.

Such a system also restores control to the hands of publishers and their proprietary metadata, creating more balance between them and ad tech vendors/advertisers. Better still, content, not audience, becomes the focus of CTV targeting, creating a model that neatly sidesteps the privacy debate and suits the mindset of any individual or group watching at once.

On TV & Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. 

Follow GumGum and AdExchanger on LinkedIn.

For more articles featuring Ken Weiner, click here.

Must Read

OOH Is Getting New Rules For Categorizing Venues In Programmatic Buys

The OAAA’s new content taxonomy introduces new subcategories that OOH media owners can use to classify their inventory in OpenRTB bid requests.

A robot and human and, colored pink, reach out toward each other against blue background

AI Made A Record Play During Super Bowl LIX

Putting aside Bad Bunny’s halftime show, AI companies stole the spotlight on Super Bowl Sunday, from Anthropic and OpenAI to Salesforce and Meta.

For Super Bowl First-Timers Manscaped And Ro, Performance Means Changing Perception

For Manscaped and Ro, the Big Game is about more than just flash and exposure. It’s about shifting how audiences perceive their brands.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Alphabet Can Outgrow Everything Else, But Can It Outgrow Ads?

Describing Google’s revenue growth has become a problem, it so vastly outpaces the human capacity to understand large numbers and percentage growth rates. The company earned more than $113 billion in Q4 2025, and more than $400 billion in the past year.

BBC Studios Benchmarks Its Podcasts To See How They Really Stack Up

Triton Digital’s new tool lets publishers see how their audience size compares to other podcasts at the show and episode level.

Comic: Traffic Jam

People Inc. Says Who Needs Google?

People Inc. is offsetting a 50% decline in Google search traffic through off-platform growth and its highest digital revenue gains in five quarters.