Home Mobile Forrester: Mobile Vendors Have An ‘Identity Crisis’ – And It’s Leaving Advertisers A Bit Confused

Forrester: Mobile Vendors Have An ‘Identity Crisis’ – And It’s Leaving Advertisers A Bit Confused

SHARE:

ForrestermobilevendorsIn today’s mobile ad tech landscape, the blind lead the blind.

That’s according to Forrester in a report released Monday that aims to help advertisers get some clarity into what’s become an immature and murky market of mobile vendors.

Most mobile tech players aren’t clear enough about the services they provide, often using jargon and buzzwords that obfuscate their offerings – but it’s not just the vendors who are to blame.

“Marketers aren’t exactly sure what to ask for from their partners, which is why vendors are trying to be the answer to any possible question,” said Forrester research analyst Jennifer Wise, who penned the report. “If you want cross-channel, the vendor will say, ‘We do cross-channel.’ If you want online to offline, they’ll say they do that, too. If you need help creating a new mobile format, they’re there.

“The bottom line is that everyone will tell you that they can do everything.”

And it’s holding the market back.

Less than a third of the 35 mobile ad tech vendors surveyed by Forrester are what Wise referred to as “purebreds,” meaning that the majority of vendors don’t identify with a single core offering. Roughly one-fifth of the vendors claimed that their capabilities span the veritable gamut at equal parts DSP, SSP, ad network, server and exchange.

While some of that can be attributed to consolidation in the market, in-house development or, simply, as the result of opportunistic – or, shall we say, proactive – positioning, the fact remains that many marketers aren’t sure how to go about selecting the right mobile ad partner.

“It’s true that advertisers are spoiled for choice – they do have a lot of it – but the core problem is not that they have their pick, but that they don’t know how to choose because they’re picking their way through jargon,” Wise said. “That’s why we’re calling on advertisers to optimize for mobile specifically, because mobile is and should be very different than whatever they’re doing for display.”

In other words, the onus is on marketers to ask the right questions and start educating themselves about the mobile space, rather than just continuing to work with whoever they work with for display because it’s convenient or because they assume their vendor knows what it’s doing.

Advertisers also need to have a clearer idea of their own goals and KPIs at the outset before grabbing onto a passing mobile vendor and shooting off into an uncertain mobile future like Marty McFly on his skateboard in “Back To The Future.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“It’s easy to get lost in the jargon and think, ‘This sounds great,’ but it’s time for advertisers to take charge, understand their own requirements first and even get into the tech a little, too,” Wise said. “ How does a particular vendor connect the online digital consumer to the store? Are they using a unique ID like an email address or are they using device location? What kind of inventory do they have access to? Ask.”

It’s about due diligence, especially in key areas such as creative capabilities, targeting granularity, inventory access and global footprint, as well as a vendor’s pricing models and any additional services and add-ons, like measurement, attribution or cross-device.

“A more informed conversation on both sides will enable advertisers to home in on a vendor’s niche in the market,” Wise said.

When that happens, mobile budgets will follow, she said.

“Once an advertiser picks the right vendor that can optimize to their requirements, their campaigns will perform better and they’ll be able to justify the spend,” Wise said. “Before then, don’t throw things at a wall and hope. Do it strategically.”

Forrester is planning a follow-up report in Q3 that will delve more deeply into the maturity and trajectory of tech in the mobile ad space.

Must Read

How AudienceMix Is Mixing Up The Data Sales Business

AudienceMix, a new curation startup, aims to make it more cost effective to mix and match different audience segments using only the data brands need to execute their campaigns.

Broadsign Acquires Place Exchange As The DOOH Category Hits Its Stride

On Tuesday, digital out-of-home (DOOH) ad tech startup Place Exchange was acquired by Broadsign, another out-of-home SSP.

Meta’s Ad Platform Is Going Haywire In Time For The Holidays (Again)

For the uninitiated, “Glitchmas” is our name for what’s become an annual tradition when, from between roughly late October through November, Meta’s ad platform just seems to go bonkers.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Closing Arguments Are Done In The US v. Google Ad Tech Case

The publisher-focused DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial is finished. A judge will now decide the fate of Google’s sell-side ad tech business.

Wall Street Wants To Know What The Programmatic Drama Is About

Competitive tensions and ad tech drama have flared all year. And this drama has rippled out into the investor circle, as evident from a slew of recent ad tech company earnings reports.

Comic: Always Be Paddling

Omnicom Allegedly Pivoted A Chunk Of Its Q3 Spend From The Trade Desk To Amazon

Two sources at ad tech platforms that observe programmatic bidding patterns said they’ve seen Omnicom agencies shifting spend from The Trade Desk to Amazon DSP in Q3. The Trade Desk denies any such shift.