Home Marketing Automation Oracle And Marketo Surf Forrester Wave On Marketing Automation

Oracle And Marketo Surf Forrester Wave On Marketing Automation

SHARE:

wizdo forresterThe first Forrester Wave on lead-to-revenue management (L2RM) automation solutions released Tuesday singled out Oracle’s Eloqua and the still independent Marketo as marketplace leaders catering to large enterprises. As defined by Forrester, L2RM is essentially B2B marketing automation.

Additionally, Act-On and Salesfusion were champions among solutions designed for small- and medium-sized businesses (SMBs). The report assessed the ability for each vendor’s technology to nurture prospect relationships over a long sales cycle.

Oracle’s and Marketo’s dominance isn’t a tremendous surprise given that both are considered the grande dames of B2B marketing automation, given their respective legacies (Principal Analyst Lori Wizdo, who wrote the report, pointed out in a release that Eloqua has been around since the early 2000s and Marketo has been around since 2006). The top performers were selected from a 75-criteria technology evaluation as well as 300 conversations with enterprise customers over the past year.

Wizdo was impressed with the consistency of the vendors she assessed. “B2B marketers are spoiled for choice in terms of technology,” she said. “There weren’t any [vendors] that we felt were risky bets, which happens a lot in a Forrester Wave.” But there were points of differentiation, particularly in the ease with which customized communication programs could be built and scaled, the level of sophistication in engagement rules, data collection and presentation and reporting and analytics.

Although certain vendors came out on top, Wizdo cautioned companies considering implementing B2B marketing automation to understand their own business needs first and foremost. Vendors with rich feature sets might be Wave “Leaders”, but it doesn’t make them the best for every type of business. “If you have a very short sales cycle in a mature market where someone will find you, then capabilities to optimize website for conversion and social channels are most important,” Wizdo said. “On the other hand if you are selling to an audience you know well in a defined market and you want outreach to them, then capabilities to deliver targeted content over a long cycle are important.”

Despite the sophistication of these B2B marketing automation technologies, Wizdo was surprised to learn how underutilized much of it is. “The theory [the technology] represents is still far ahead of the practice of what [enterprise customers are] actually doing,” she said. “From my conversations, and this is anecdotal and not based on Forrester data, about half of the people I talked to aren’t doing A/B testing of their email subject lines. All of these products enable it easily. That 50% of the people I talked to [didn’t do it] was surprising. It’s almost like not flossing your teeth: Why wouldn’t you do this? It should be just basic hygiene but people aren’t doing it.”

Another under-used tool was progressive profiling, which operates under the theory that a prospect is less likely to fill out a long form with numerous fields than a short one. The B2B marketing automation tools Wizdo examined all had the ability to allow customers to progressively fill out forms (ie name and email during the first visit, company size during the second, etc).

Besides Oracle and Marketo, other “Leaders” included Adobe’s Neolane, Act-On, and Salesforce.com’s Pardot. One tier below as “Strong Performers” were CallidusCloud, IBM, Salesfusion and Silverpop.

And while Act-On and Salesfusion topped the SMB space, Oracle and Adobe were only “Contenders.”

Must Read

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.