Home Data Tealium Zeroes In On Conversion APIs As a Solution For Signal Loss

Tealium Zeroes In On Conversion APIs As a Solution For Signal Loss

SHARE:
server-side API
Server, Internet and Network Icons Set on White Background. Line Style Vector

Necessity – and signal loss – is the mother of invention.

Without ready access to device IDs and other identifiers, it gets a lot more difficult to measure ad effectiveness and tie conversions to clicks.

But as cookies, pixels and SDK data become increasingly unreliable, almost all of the large ad platforms are pushing server-side implementations to get conversion information from advertisers.

Advertisers share web, app or offline event data directly from their server with a platform in order to attribute outcomes to ad clicks.

It’s a neat little trick.

Meta has been nudging advertisers to enable its conversions API (CAPI) since 2020, back when Meta was still called Facebook and Apple first announced plans to release its AppTrackingTransparency framework.

Since then, Google, Pinterest, TikTok, Twitter, Snap and Spotify have all released their own flavors of conversion API.

“There have been a lot of chipped teeth along the way to get this product right, but this is like a reset for the future of the advertising industry,” said Jenna Fair, senior director of partnerships at Tealium, a customer data platform (CDP) that’s made it a priority to integrate with all the various CAPI solutions.

Feather in the CAPI

It makes sense for a CDP with its roots in tag management, like Tealium, to position itself as a conduit for conversion events to flow into a platform’s event API, said Fair, because it’s already a repository for an advertiser’s first-party data, including offline actions.

“You need strong first-party data first; that’s your foundation,” she said. “And then you can use that data to create audience segments based on real user behavior and conversion-level insights.”

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

So far, roughly one-third of Tealium’s client base – more than 300 companies – have implemented at least one conversion API.

By using a conversion API in combination with pixels, many have seen an increase in their conversion rates and return on ad spend, said Matt Gray, Tealium’s head of global partnerships.

Whereas tracking pixels track how people interact with a webpage, an events API like CAPI can pass CRM data, multichannel conversion paths between a website and a physical location and lower-funnel events, such as registrations and qualified leads.

“It really is an opportunity for advertisers to get more visibility into conversions and more accurate attribution than just using a pixel,” he said. “It’s a way to future-proof.”

But one man’s future-proofed solution might be considered a workaround by someone else. Apple in particular doesn’t take kindly to workarounds.

Known unknowns

Although conversion APIs seem like a panacea for signal loss and related measurement challenges, there’s no telling yet whether they really are a sustainable, long-term solution.

In a recent post at Mobile Dev Memo, Eric Seufert floated the notion that server-side integrations might not be as durable as they appear on the surface.

Consider Privacy Manifests.

During its most recent Worldwide Developers Conference in June, Apple announced Privacy Manifests, which are files that outline the privacy practices of any third-party code running in an app. Developers are meant to use this information to create more accurate Privacy Nutrition Labels so people can see what personal data an app collects before downloading it.

Seufert points out that Privacy Manifests don’t yet apply to server-to-server data transmissions; they’re primarily for third-party SDKs. But there’s nothing stopping Apple from using them to disrupt conversion APIs down the line.

Tealium’s product road map is built with the awareness that more privacy changes are likely, Gray said. Still, there’s only so much companies can do to plan for future eventualities. For now, the platforms and their partners are betting big on CAPIs.

“Data deprecation, the restriction of information – these things are always going to impede marketing practices, and if it’s not Apple, it’s going to be something else, including regulation,” Gray said. “Deprecation will happen no matter what, we just need to stay flexible.”

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.