Home Data Facebook Lets Competing Advertisers Target Off Each Other’s Site And App Data

Facebook Lets Competing Advertisers Target Off Each Other’s Site And App Data

SHARE:

fb-like-dataOne of Facebook’s hidden assets is the waterfall of data signals it gets from other websites and apps.

These signals wend their way to Facebook from social plugins, conversion pixels and retargeting cookies embedded on millions of websites and mobile apps. Facebook’s code snippets tell the social network whenever a user lands on a product page, reads an article or researches a travel package. It has been collecting such data for years, but has never activated it for ad-targeting purposes.

Until now.

Facebook will soon begin using data signals gathered from its publisher integrations to inform ad messaging, creating profiles based on a far more complete universe of potentially interested buyers than it has ever made available to advertisers before. In making the announcement, Facebook also said it will offer more robust user privacy controls, including opting out of this new stream of intent data.

This could get awkward fast, since Facebook will effectively be selling data from one advertiser to its competitors – perhaps generating targeted fashion ads from Target based in part on a person’s interest in swimwear gathered from a visit to HM.com.

“Advertisers may now potentially be suppliers of ‘signal’ for their competitors to buy ads against,” is how Rob Leathern, former CEO at Facebook PMD Optimal Inc., put it.

Facebook says it is sensitive to such concerns, and it intends to restrict its intent profiles to broad categories (“soccer enthusiast” rather than “soccer accessories shoppers”).

“We’re going to build this so that no single marketer’s data will disproportionately represent what we use to improve our ads targeting or ads delivery capabilities. In principle, this means larger marketers won’t disproportionately benefit their competitors,” it said in a statement to AdExchanger.

Additionally, website owners will be able to opt out of having data generated from their websites or mobile apps used for purposes of ads targeting. However, if they do so, they lose access to other marketers’ Web and app interest data.

In other words, if you want access to Facebook’s full arsenal of ad-targeting tools, you have to pay with your site and app data.

History suggests Facebook will keep the targeting broad, according to Marc Grabowski, entrepreneur-in-residence at Highland Capital Partners and a former senior executive at Nanigans and Yahoo.

“There is a decade of precedence with publishers anonymizing and aggregating data sets for category targeting purposes,” Grabowski said. “Publishers frequently use category-specific click data to inform behavioral targeting audiences, but less frequently leverage advertiser website landing-page data, as that can be considered crossing the line of data ownership.”

The extent to which site owners with valuable data will go with the flow, or ask to be removed from Facebook’s program, may depend on the nature of each advertiser and its strategic considerations.

Jewelry retailer Alex and Ani is one advertiser that will participate.

“The value of what we’re getting outweighs the risk of giving up data to a competitive set,” said Ryan Bonifacino, VP of digital strategy for the brand. Informing competitor campaigns is not a large concern, he said. “We assume that very forward-thinking sophisticated organizations can get our (shopper data) anyway. The Sephoras of the world have the ability to target Alex and Ani customers if they want to.”

Bonifacino does have a gripe for Facebook about the new program: “My major issue is a lack of education not only with our brand but with every other customer.”

Alex and Ani’s comfort with Facebook intent targeting can be partly attributed to the relatively short consideration cycle for the casual jewelry it sells. Marketers in the automotive, travel and financial categories are likely to fret more.

“This is great for brands who may not have a deep first-party data asset as they will be able to benefit from data gathered on vertically relevant sites and apps,” said Grabowski of Highland Capital Partners. “This will become especially interesting if category specific desktop website data can be leveraged to target audiences using mobile devices.”

Tagged in:

Must Read

How TIME’s CMS Transition Laid The Foundation For Its AI-Driven Content Overhaul

The CMS migration helped unify TIME’s fragmented content data after years of platform transitions under multiple owners. This enabled TIME to launch its own AI search product and convert archival content into AI-friendly “markdown” pages.

Adobe Advertising Just Launched Its Own Custom Algorithms Product

Last week, Adobe Advertising announced the general release of its own Custom Algorithms product, which is “a huge departure from the TubeMogul days,” Erwin Castellanos, GM of Adobe Advertising, tells AdExchanger.

MFA Ad Spend Is Increasing. Is AI Slop To Blame?

This year, the percentage of ad spend going toward made-for-advertising (MFA) sites went up instead of down for the first time since 2023.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Kickbacks Takes An Outsider’s View While Bringing Ads To AI Agents

Andrew McCalip is a founding engineer at Varda Space Industries, where he oversees the manufacturing of things like hypersonic reentry vehicles and satellite buses.

CTV Buyers Are Getting The Show-Level Performance Optimization They’ve Always Wanted

A collaboration between InterMedia Advertising, Peer39 and Pontiac Intelligence provided show-level cost-per-acquisition data for 94% of CTV ad impressions.

Advertisers Await Programmatic Pause Ads

The IAB Tech Lab is working on standardizing programmatic signals for new streaming TV ad formats, including pause ads. Meanwhile, many brands are eager to add pause ads to their repertoire.