Home Commerce Criteo Splits Out Retail Media Revenue For The First Time

Criteo Splits Out Retail Media Revenue For The First Time

SHARE:
Comic: Shopper Marketing Data

Criteo has decided to show off its retail media revenue.

During its earnings call Thursday morning, the company split out its retail media business for the first time.

The retail media unit, which primarily consists of what Criteo calls Commerce Max – a network of placements across retailers and online merchants – earned $50.2 million in Q1. That’s up from $37.4 million during the same period last year.

Performance Media, meanwhile, the segment that houses Criteo’s legacy retargeting business, generated $399.2 million in Q1, a smidge down from $407 million a year ago.

Shares of Criteo’s stock price leapt by about 10% after it reported earnings.

The bottom line

It’s no surprise that investors are giving Criteo a nod of approval for its performance last quarter.

From the perspective of equity number crunchers, the state of Criteo’s balance sheet has improved.

For example, Criteo’s total revenue in Q1 improved modestly year over year from $445 million to $450 million. But in terms of profitability, Criteo went from a $12 million loss in Q1 2023 to a $9 million net gain so far this year.

Part of its improved profitability comes from headcount reduction, including a round of layoffs in April.

But there’s another reason investors are pleased: Criteo’s traffic acquisition costs (TAC) were down from $224.4 million a year ago to $196.2 million in Q1. TAC is what Criteo pays out to retailers, search engines and other places from which it must buy traffic.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

And Criteo’s TAC will continue to come down as retail media overtakes retargeting, since retargeting is the part of the business that requires large TAC expenditures.

Google’s third-party cookie deprecation plan for Chrome is also a tailwind for Criteo, CEO Megan Clarken told investors. The company forecasts a roughly $35 million loss this year, as Chrome becomes a far less hospitable place to run third-party retargeting campaigns.

But wait. Didn’t Google just delay deprecation until next year?

Criteo’s potential losses don’t just get pushed along with the deprecation deadline, Clarken said. With more time to sharpen its post-cookie identity products, deprecation-related losses diminish, she added.

That’s a somewhat bitter pill. But investors like the fact that Criteo is also heavily repurchasing shares this year, which drives up the value of any shares remaining on the market even if the company’s market cap remains unchanged. Clarken said Criteo spent $62 million on buybacks in Q1 and plans to spend at least $150 million on share repurchases throughout 2024.

The retail tale

But back to Criteo’s retail numbers.

It’s pretty clear why the company is keen to share them now and why it’s leaning so hard into being a retail media business, when in fact its revenue split remains heavily skewed toward performance media and retargeting.

For one, retail media is where the growth is.

Criteo’s total ad revenue growth rate was 3%, which is below the growth rate of advertising overall and could imply Criteo is losing market share. But its Retail Media segment grew by 33%, which far outpaces the market, Clarken said.

“We have a leading market footprint,” she said, with more than 200 retailers and 2,700 brands. “This is now miles ahead of any competitor with our scaled network of retailers.”

Criteo also saw outsized growth from agencies in Q1.

Clarken attributed the boost to a shift in how brands spend their retail media budgets. Rather than spending trade marketing dollars directly with retailers for in-store marketing, such as store displays, shelf placement and coupons, brands are giving that budget to agency media buyers running national campaigns tied to in-store and online purchases.

“That’s the magic of retail media,” Clarken said. “Leaning into that over the next few years is what’s going to get us to the place that we want to be, which is the ultimate complement to an Amazon buy.”

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.