Home Analytics DoubleClick Ad Tracking Now Allowed on Facebook

DoubleClick Ad Tracking Now Allowed on Facebook

SHARE:

Facebook has certified DoubleClick for ad impression tracking, ending an unofficial policy against Google technologies on its platform.

Sources tell AdExchanger Facebook’s decision went into effect in the last two weeks. It’s undoubtedly good news for DoubleClick and its customers, who will now be able to track and attribute Facebook campaign impressions alongside their other online ad placements.

While the move suggests a thawing of Facebook’s historically chilly stance toward Google, it’s important to point out it comes amid a general liberalization of Facebook’s third party ad tracking program. Late last month Facebook confirmed Microsoft’s Atlas ad server as a preferred tracking provider. And two weeks ago it granted tracking certification to Adometry, a pure play attribution vendor. So this may be less about Google than it is about honoring advertiser requests for third party measurement.

At least one other Facebook embargo against Google still stands. DoubleClick Bid Manager – the DSP previously known as Invite Media – is conspicuously excluded from the list of DSPs permitted to access RTB inventory on the Facebook Exchange. Facebook Exchange still represents a very small fraction of Facebook’s marketplace ad inventory, so that’s something that could change in the future as well.

Another question concerns Facebook’s response to Google buying Wildfire Interactive, a deal announced yesterday. Wildfire enjoys preferred vendor status in its Insights, Apps, and Pages areas. Will Facebook continue to grant it that designation, and how will it respond if Google seeks approval as an Ads API provider, or buys a company that already has it? Time will tell.

Even with the wider acceptance of view through tracking technologies, there remain significant restrictions on Facebook impression tracking. Advertisers can still only drop tracking cookies when premium ads are served, and not for marketplace inventory. Also, impression tracking doesn’t apply to owned and earned impressions generated through brand Pages.

Facebook declined comment.

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)