Home AdExchanger Talks Podcast: Tips For Incremental In-Housing

Podcast: Tips For Incremental In-Housing

SHARE:

Welcome to episode No. 20 of AdExchanger Talks, a podcast focused on data-driven marketing. Subscribe here.

For marketers considering bringing programmatic advertising in-house, Jounce Media founder Chris Kane has a word of advice: Break the process into steps.

“There are a lot of ad tech companies that are selling the dream to marketers that you’re going to follow the Netflix playbook,” he says. “You’re going to hire a team, you’re going to run what feels like a trading floor.”

But it’s not that easy.

In the 20th episode of AdExchanger Talks, Kane offers suggestions for how to pull off an incremental in-housing process. And he doesn’t endorse firing your agency entirely.

Kane often encounters marketers who want to bring programmatic buying in-house in one fell swoop. But there are other things to do first, he cautions.

“What I’ve seen work best for most marketers is, start with data management,” he says. “Media buying is harder than it’s made out to be. It takes a lot of effort to do the constant blocking and tackling of campaign execution. Data management is potentially more strategically valuable for a marketer and much easier to execute.”

Kane asks his most eager clients whether they’ve organized their first-party data around a data management platform, whether they’re sourcing exclusive third-party data, whether they’ve brought their measurement in-house and whether they’ve built custom attribution models.

“Do all of these things first, before you think about actually executing media in-house.”

Why is media execution so difficult, exactly? Part of the issue is the ad tech space is still not mature. DSPs commit errors frequently, and you end up on the phone trying to sort out why it went offline or why you overspent on budget. Additionally, the high-octane M&A environment in ad tech means your partner may be acquired and thus imperil your considerable investment in managing it.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

“This is a volatile industry,” Kane says. “If I’m a marketer who is going to put my reputation on the line to basically fire my agency and bring all of this media-buying functionality in house, I have got to feel a high level of confidence that anything that can be controlled is going to work properly.”

But for those willing to weather that volatility, it’s a pretty great time to be an ad tech customer.

In addition to heavy price competition, “There is such a sense of urgency on the part of these platforms to create differentiators… as the buyer of this tech there is a remarkable amount of opportunity to shape the product. I’m shocked by their ability to go to ad tech companies with crazy product demands. Everybody says yes. It’s unbelievable, and I think it creates a real opportunity for the buyers of technology.”

Also in this episode: Financial pressures on today’s CMOs, the measurement games publishers play, new sources of innovation in ad tech and the impact of header bidding on the buy side.

 

Acxiom

 

 

 

This episode is supported by Acxiom.

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.