Home The Sell Sider ATT Is Here, But First-Party Data Offers A Path Forward For App Publishers

ATT Is Here, But First-Party Data Offers A Path Forward For App Publishers

SHARE:
Thanh Do, product marketing manager, Permutive

The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community.

Today’s column is written by Thanh Do, product marketing manager at Permutive.

It’s no secret that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency (ATT) framework has rocked the advertising industry. Before the introduction of opt-in consent, 70% of users enabled cross-app tracking. But as of September 2021, only 21% of users worldwide have opted into ATT

With Google set to enforce similar privacy changes to Android Advertising ID soon, advertisers and publishers are left with no choice but to adapt to these significant changes to mobile privacy. But there are a few ways to address the challenges that come with requiring explicit tracking consent. 

App publishers have a unique opportunity to offer advertisers an alternative to device IDs. 

Here’s why they need to switch their long-term focus to privacy-compliant first-party data.

The value of publisher audiences is declining

Without Mobile advertising IDs (MAIDs), Apple and Android will be limited in their ability to collect sufficient data to scale audience reach, track and measure campaign performance for advertisers. In addition, it will cost advertisers more to achieve the same results. For example, loose-tea-leaf seller Plum Deluxe once spent $27 a month to acquire a customer and now spends $270

With reach and measurement capabilities waning and prices inevitably shooting up, advertisers will need to seek alternative platforms with rich first-party data for reallocating their media dollars. This leaves the door wide open for app publishers.

First-party data is becoming the new gold standard 

As guardians of data, publishers have access to a robust range of consumers that interact with their portfolio of websites and apps. This wealth of first-party data provides the kind of behavioral insight that advertisers seek, making publisher solutions valuable and attractive.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But relying on existing first-party data alone will not allow for a long-term sustainable business model that maximizes revenue and monetizes this opportunity. Publishers should explore a combination as they navigate ATT and prepare for a future without MAIDs. 

Develop a strong first-party data strategy

Use this opportunity to improve direct customer relationships and collect different types of first-party data. 

Increase transparency

Mobile app publishers can control the messaging used in the opt-in notification. Be transparent with how the data collected will alleviate consumer concerns and encourage user opt-in.  

Demonstrate value

Focus on improving the in-app experience. Demonstrate to users the value of opting-in in exchange for a personalized experience. 

Explore new technology

Start embracing and testing new infrastructures that are privacy-compliant and not reliant on mobile IDs.

What happens next?

App publishers can see excellent results by effectively tapping into first-party data. That means using real-time targeting on first-page views at scale on both Apple and Android devices, without reliance on IDFA or MAIDs.

Mobile app publishers should adapt early. By investing in contextual and privacy-compliant first-party data to combat ATT, they’ll offer a viable alternative solution for advertisers.

Follow Permutive (@Permutive) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Publishers Feel Seen At The Google Ad Tech Antitrust Trial

Publishers were encouraged to see the DOJ highlight Google’s stranglehold on the ad server market and its attempts to weaken header bidding.

Albert Thompson, Managing Director, Digital at Walton Isaacson

To Cure What Ails Digital Advertising, Marketers And Publishers Must Get Back To Basics

Albert Thompson, a buy-side veteran with 20+ years of experience, weighs in on attention metrics, the value of MFA sites, brand safety backlash and how publishers can improve their inventory.

A comic depiction of Google's ad machine sucking money out of a publisher.

DOJ vs. Google, Day Five Rewind: Prebid Reality Check, Unfair Rev Share And Jedi Blue (Sorta)

Someone will eventually need to make a Netflix-style documentary about the Google ad tech antitrust trial happening in Virginia. (And can we call it “You’ve Been Ad Served?”)

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.