Home The Big Story Will AI Companies Pay Publishers?

Will AI Companies Pay Publishers?

SHARE:

If you ask an AI agent about the best 401(k) plans, you’ll likely get a unique answer. But the responses are stitched together and reworded from publishers who used to earn a pretty penny by crafting such high-intent content.

If the IAB Tech Lab gets its way, publishers writing about the best 401(k) plans, to name one example, would be compensated every time their story informs a response to a user query. They would also be able to block AI crawlers and make sure their content wasn’t used without payment.

This AI Content Monetization Protocol (CoMP), previewed at AdMonsters’ Sell Side Summit last week, appears to be catching publishers’ attention. But only Google and Meta, already members of the IAB Tech Lab, are participating in the working group.

That doesn’t mean these AI companies aren’t thinking about what they may need to offer publishers. Separately, Perplexity just offered to set aside $42.5 million to compensate publishers.

What do publishers choose? And will they have the leverage to negotiate with powerful AI companies? AI companies may be startups, but they also are attempting to make powerful allies, like committing up to $200 million to hire AI-friendly politicians. Overall, publishers at the Sell Side Summit were optimistic about AI helping them grow their businesses. But time will tell the fate of publishers, as tech disrupts the media industry once again.

The rise of pause

Custom pause ads have long been a jewel of connected TV. They can be clever, hawking products that people consume during pauses, like snacks or toilet paper on bathroom breaks.

But their custom nature, as well as their perceived high attention, has made them jewels for programmers. And the jewels usually don’t go up for programmatic auctions.

This dynamic is changing. Magnite is offering pause ads with DirecTV, Dish and Fubo, and Kargo is also running pause ads. Video games, too, increasingly incorporate pause ads into gameplay.

We discuss the pros and cons of pause ads for users, especially when the ads hide the content users are pausing to see. As their adoption rises, will users hail pause ads as a better alternative to commercial breaks, or will making pause ads programmatic result in sloppier or mismatched executions that make viewers grumble?

Must Read

Amazon Ads Is All In On Simplicity

“We just constantly hear how complex it is right now,” Kelly MacLean, Amazon Ads VP of engineering, science and product, tells AdExchanger. “So that’s really where we we’ve anchored a lot on hearing their feedback, [and] figuring out how we can drive even more simplicity.”

Betrayal, business, deal, greeting, competition concept. Lie deception and corporate dishonesty illustration. Businessmen leaders entrepreneurs making agreement holding concealing knives behind backs.

How PubMatic Countered A Big DSP’s Spending Dip In Q3 (And Our Theory On Who It Was)

In July, PubMatic saw a temporary drop in ad spend from a “large” unnamed DSP partner, which contributed to Q3 revenue of $68 million, a 5% YOY decline.

Paramount Skydance Merged Its Business – Now It’s Ready To Merge Its Tech Stack

Paramount Skydance, which officially turns 100 days old this week, released its first post-merger quarterly earnings report on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
The Arena Group's Stephanie Mazzamaro (left) chats with ad tech consultant Addy Atienza at AdMonsters' Sell Side Summit Austin.

For Publishers, AI Gives Monetizable Data Insight But Takes Away Traffic

Traffic-starved publishers are hopeful that their long-undervalued audience data will fuel advertising’s automated future – if only they can finally wrest control of the industry narrative away from ad tech middlemen.

Q3: The Trade Desk Delivers On Financials, But Is Its Vision Fact Or Fantasy?

The Trade Desk posted solid Q3 results on Thursday, with $739 million in revenue, up 18% year over year. But the main narrative for TTD this year is less about the numbers and more about optics and competitive dynamics.

Comic: He Sees You When You're Streaming

IP Address Match Rates Are a Joke – And It’s No Laughing Matter

According to a new report, IP-to-email matches are accurate just 16% of the time on average, while IP-to-postal matches are accurate only 13% of the time. (Oof.)