Home Strategy App Developers, Watch Out For These CTV Advertising Blunders

App Developers, Watch Out For These CTV Advertising Blunders

SHARE:
When messaging app developer Pinger started experimenting with CTV advertising last year, it learned a lot – about what not to do.
computer sign icon

When Pinger, a startup that develops messaging and communications apps, started experimenting with CTV advertising last year, it learned a lot – about what not to do.

Pinger’s apps include Sideline, which gives users a secondary phone number on their smartphone, and a free texting and calling app called TextFree. Together they have more than 140 million downloads.

For Pinger’s first attempt, a promotion for TextFree, it worked with a CTV agency that shall remain nameless because the campaign “didn’t go super well,” said Brook Lenox, senior marketing manager at Pinger, speaking at the MAU Vegas conference in Las Vegas last week.

“Mistake number one is that we really thought a CTV agency could guide us through the process … and I would encourage you not to assume that,” Lenox said. “I would encourage you to ask a lot of questions.”

Ask “until they get a little frustrated with you,” he said.

For example, don’t assume that an agency is going to share campaign data: Confirm it.

“This is new, and they’re doing the best they can,” he said. “But that doesn’t mean it’s necessarily all there.”

Experience is the best teacher

And so mistakes will be made.

Pinger didn’t do any targeting, including geotargeting, for its initial TextFree CTV campaign. That approach was a “big miss,” Lenox said. Pinger also only ran one piece of video creative for the duration of the campaign and didn’t track metrics other than monitoring the CPMs.

Pinger’s main takeaway from its first CTV rodeo is that YouTube is a cost-effective CTV channel.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

But, other than that, “at the end of the test we understood nothing,” Lenox said.

And so Pinger ran another CTV campaign for TextFree and started working with Tetra TV, a CTV ad network and analytics platform launched in 2019 by two former Roku executives, including Jim Lombard, now Tetra TV’s CEO and previously Roku’s head of ad sales and business development.

Last year, when Pinger was running its CTV experiments, Tetra TV was a brand-new scrappy startup, and Lombard would just hop on the phone with Lenox. “He trained me on all the stuff I didn’t know about CTV,” Lenox said.

For its second TextFree campaign on CTV, Pinger ran two different video creatives across YouTube, Tetra TV and Facebook split across four geos. Pinger also added a branded search element using Google Ads and partnered with MNTN (formerly SteelHouse and currently that ad tech platform Ryan Reynolds loves shilling for).

Pinger tracked account creation in the cities it targeted (both before and after the CTV campaign ran) and ported the results from its search campaign into Google Data Studio so it could see the impact of its CTV campaign on branded searches in those geos.

Both YouTube and TETRA had a positive impact on account creation, while Facebook and MNTN’s impact was muted, he said.

But Pinger didn’t have any control geo, only test geos, which made it hard to discern whether there were other factors that affected the results. Its video creatives were also too similar to draw any conclusions about which was more successful. The only difference was a minor variation in the text overlays.

Pinger also didn’t have a mechanism in place to track engagement, which is important if you want to treat CTV as a performance channel.

Mobile app developers are accustomed to tracking clicks, installs and sign-ups, but, to state the obvious, there’s no way to click on a CTV ad.

“At this point, we started to realize that CTV is not your typical channel,” Lenox said. “There are ways to track some of that [engagement] now, but, in this case, it was a fairly big fail.”

Learning, growing

One way to track engagement on CTV is to use QR codes, which made a comeback during the pandemic and have become a go-to for performance marketers.

For its third test, Pinger added QR codes to its video creatives and ran them across the two best-performing channels from its previous test (YouTube and Tetra TV) in four geos, which included three test cities and one control group.

Pinger also made sure that the creatives it ran this time around were different enough from each other that it could learn something from the test. One of the videos had a rather small QR code located in the bottom right corner, while the other had a gigantic QR code that took up almost half the screen. Both QRs were static and remained on-screen for the duration of the ad.

Pinger tracked QR code scans and cost per scan. Unsurprisingly, the ad with the larger QR code performed better. But Pinger also learned a few more nuanced lessons.

For example, adding a control geo to its targeting gave Pinger more confidence that its campaign was actually having an impact in the test cities. Pinger also found subtle differences in performance between its two best channels. Although YouTube was much better at driving searches, Tetra TV led to more QR code scans.

And that was one of Pinger’s biggest takeaways: Know what you want to measure from your CTV campaign before you start.

It all “depends on what metric feels most important to you,” Lenox said.

Must Read

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.