Home Privacy LiveRamp Launches Its Own Consent Management Platform (CCPA ETA: 28 Days)

LiveRamp Launches Its Own Consent Management Platform (CCPA ETA: 28 Days)

SHARE:

Compliance tools are coming out of the woodwork with less than a month to go until the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) goes into effect on Jan. 1.

The latest is a consent management platform from LiveRamp released on Wednesday, which the data onboarding company built using technology it acquired from Europe-based CMP Faktor in April.

Dubbed Privacy Manager, the CMP is designed to be flexible enough to roll with the regulatory punches, said Tim Geenen, GM of Faktor, which was founded specifically to gather and account for GDPR-compliant consent.

The new version of the tool is configurable by geographical area, which is necessary since privacy regs are coming into force around the world. Beyond Europe and California, Geenen and his team have their eye on Japan, China, Australia and Brazil, and on other state-based laws in the United States, including Nevada.

“We made a switch at a core infrastructure level,” Geenen said. “Instead of having a dedicated platform, we took everything apart to build a container with logic that determines the region you’re in and decides which configuration should load based on the legislation that applies.”

In the European Union under GDPR, that means providing notice and choice options geared toward getting users to proactively share their consent. For California consumers protected by the CCPA, it means providing visitors with the opportunity to opt out of the sale of their personal information.

LiveRamp’s CMP is also interoperable with different compliance frameworks by default, including the CCPA-focused tools recently released by the Interactive Advertising Bureau and Digital Advertising Alliance, respectively, and with IAB Europe’s Transparency and Consent Framework (TCF) for GDPR.

The TCF is a good example of why a really viable CMP should be extensible. Although European data protection authorities haven’t shared concrete guidelines on whether consent strings are GDPR-compliant, they’ve intimated that the concept of porting consent through the supply chain could be considered legally dubious. If consent strings eventually fail legal scrutiny, it’s a CMP’s job to adapt.

Although one of a CMP’s main selling points is to help companies comply with their regulatory obligations by tracking user consent and approved vendors, there’s another side benefit to providing consumers with clear options about how their data is collected and used: access to better data.

“Consent is only the first step here; after that, it’s about building a relationship with the user, getting them involved in a value exchange,” Geenen said. “Once you do that, you can command better CPMs and do better addressable targeting.”

That last bit is still theoretical. But it’s only logical that publishers will be able to command higher CPMs with permissioned data when the dust settles – especially because the opposite is proving true in Europe. Geenen said he’s observed lower CPMs for data that doesn’t have an associated consent signal.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Privacy Manager is already live with several hundred brand clients across Europe and the United States, but LiveRamp expects its pipeline to grow dramatically between now and February, a month after the CCPA goes into effect.

“A lot of companies are waiting until the last minute to start figuring out how to build a solution for their site, or they’re underestimating the amount of effort it will take,” said Anneka Gupta, president and head of products and platforms at LiveRamp. “Just like with GDPR, we saw the most scrambling right before and right after the law went into effect.”

It makes sense for LiveRamp to position itself as a privacy-safe data company. LiveRamp is a nexus for the flow of consumer data across the advertising ecosystem, which is a powerful position but one that could also leave it more exposed to greater scrutiny from regulators.

It’s been debated internally whether LiveRamp is particularly vulnerable on the regulatory front, Geenen said, and the consensus has been “no.”

“And that’s because LiveRamp realized early on that if consumers don’t engage, data companies won’t exist in the future,” he said. “This [the CMP] isn’t a power play for us, it’s the realization that consumers have a voice now, and they want to see value for their data.”

Must Read

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

DOJ v. Google: How Judge Brinkema Seems To Be Thinking After Week One

Where the DOJ v. Google ad tech antitrust trial stands after one week’s worth of remedies arguments.

Swish, A Company That's Bringing Programmatic to Product Sampling, Announces Seed Funding

Swish, a startup that partners with retailers to provide product full-size CPG samples to people doing their grocery shopping online, announces $2.3 million in seed funding.

DOJ v. Google: During Opening Arguments, The DOJ And Google Battle Over An AdX Divestiture

Court is back in session. And the fate of  the open internet is in the balance.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Chris Mufarrige, director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC

FTC Consumer Protection Chief: No Easy Answers On Privacy, ‘Only Trade-Offs’

Privacy isn’t black-and-white, says the FTC’s Chris Mufarrige, promising evidence-driven consumer protection cases under the Trump administration.

How Encryption Keys Could Resolve The TID Furor

Rather than sharing universal TIDs that any DSP or curator can access, Raptive says publishers should instead share encrypted TIDs with an encryption key provided only to trusted demand-side partners.

Clear Channel Brings Mid-Flight Measurement To Its OOH Network

Clear Channel will provide advertisers weekly, mid-flight reports on outcomes driven by its inventory in order to bring OOH measurement closer to the speed of digital.