Home Privacy Ad Trade Orgs Appeal To California AG: Clarify Your Privacy Law, Please

Ad Trade Orgs Appeal To California AG: Clarify Your Privacy Law, Please

SHARE:

Attention: Attorney General, State of California
Re: California Consumer Privacy Act

You’re killing us here.

Thanks,
The advertising industry

The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) is set to take effect in 2020 and the advertising community is desperate for some clarification.

On Tuesday, a coalition of ad trade orgs sent a joint letter to the office of California Attorney General Xavier Becerra calling attention to what they call the “negative impact of certain sections” of the law.

The signatories include the Association of National Advertisers, the Interactive Advertising Bureau, the American Association of Advertising Agencies, the American Advertising Federation and the Network Advertising Initiative.

The letter coincides with a series of six public hearings being hosted by the AG’s office across California through early March as part of its preliminary rulemaking process to promulgate the law and solicit feedback. The next hearing is on Feb. 5 in Sacramento.

So, what are the particular bees buzzing in the ad industry’s bonnet?

At the top of the list are the scope of the CCPA’s definition of personal information, the potential elimination of loyalty programs due to the law’s “non-discrimination requirements” and confusion over how to accommodate users that choose to opt in to some forms of data collection but not others.

“Without clarification and adjustments, these and other ambiguities in the law could result in reduced choice and privacy for consumers, rather than expanding it, as the law intended,” the signees stated.

Excerpts outlining the trade orgs’ particular areas of concern are reprinted below. (Click here to read the whole shebang.)

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

***********************

Section 1798.115(d) of the CCPA prohibits a company from selling consumer personal information that it did not receive directly from the consumer unless the consumer has received “explicit notice” and is provided an opportunity to exercise the right to opt out of that sale. We urge the AG to recognize that a written assurance of CCPA compliance is sufficient and reasonable.

Sections 1798.105 and 1798.120 of the CCPA allow consumers entirely to opt out of the sale of their data or delete their data; but the law does not explicitly permit a business to offer a consumer the choice to delete or opt out regarding some, but not all, of their data. We request that the AG clarify that businesses may offer reasonable options to consumers to choose the types of “sales” they want to opt out of, the types of data they want deleted, or to completely opt out – and not have to just provide an all-or-nothing option.

 Section 1798.110(c) of the CCPA arguably requires a business’ privacy policy to disclose to a consumer the specific pieces of personal information the business has collected about that consumer. We ask the AG to clarify that a business does not need to create individualized privacy policies for each consumer to comply with the law.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.