Home Platforms How Chango Poached Customers From Reseller Partner eBay Enterprise

How Chango Poached Customers From Reseller Partner eBay Enterprise

SHARE:

Chango EBay EnterpriseRubicon Project-owned Chango recently poached customers from eBay Enterprise who were using a white-labeled version of Chango’s product, AdExchanger has learned.

In what could be construed as a cautionary tale to any company bundling and reselling a partner’s technology, Chango sales reps approached the dozen or so retailers, some of them with significant media budgets, using the technology through eBay Enterprise.

Chango told retailers using eBay Enterprise that it could offer the same technology without eBay Enterprise’s markup, leading to a better return on investment.

EBay Enterprise found out about the sales maneuver when customers started calling to say Chango had pitched them.

According to sources, Chango CEO Chris Sukorny timed the sales push to follow eBay Enterprise’s spinoff from eBay, announced in mid-July and closing later this year. That way, he could take away eBay Enterprise’s customers just when the employees were preoccupied with dealing with the details of the split, the sources said. There was also some confusion internally over whether the split would void the contract with eBay Enterprise.

But it’s not clear if Sukorny cleared the move with his higher-ups at Rubicon Project, which acquired Chango at the end of March. One of Rubicon Project’s biggest customers is eBay, so poaching clients carried a risk for that relationship.

What happened after those sales pitches depends on who you ask. One source said “nearly all” of the advertisers and agencies doing retargeting with eBay Enterprise left after Chango’s outreach.

But a source defended Rubicon Project’s moves, calling them the isolated work of overeager junior sales reps, and said no clients immediately cancelled with eBay Enterprise because of the sales pitches. According to that source’s timeline, eBay Enterprise contacted Chango immediately after seeing a sales email to one of its clients and Chango then halted all sales communications. The source also said the two companies continue to work with each other.

EBay Enterprise declined to comment for this story.

EBay Enterprise used to have its own retargeting technology, FetchBack, which was part of eBay’s $2.4 billion acquisition of GSI Commerce in 2011. But eBay reportedly did not invest in the product and was forced to find a vendor to replace it.

That vendor was Chango.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

EBay Enterprise started working with Chango in January, adding its own proprietary first-party data on top of Chango’s tech to add value. The usual contracts were in place to protect eBay’s data.

This white-label deal with eBay Enterprise accounted for about 10% of Chango’s business, according to a source familiar with the acquisition.

In the world of ad tech, there are often layers of technology partners, each taking a cut. EBay Enterprise may have been marking up the retargeting inventory a bit too much, one source speculated.

One Chango deck, publicly available on Slideshare, boasted of a return on ad spend of 13:1 for an industrial supply retailer, 30:1 for a luxury travel company and 92:1 for a leading department store.

In contrast, the slide showed a 4:1 return on ad spend for eBay campaigns on the Chango Enterprise Platform.

“I think ultimately you could make the argument that the [poached] eBay Enterprise customers win in this case, because of the value [Chango] is really bringing,” said a source familiar with what happened. “If your trading desk or marketing solution isn’t offering a true value, then why does that middleman even exist?”

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.