Home Platforms DOJ Appeals AT&T-Time Warner Ruling

DOJ Appeals AT&T-Time Warner Ruling

SHARE:

Hold the phone, it ain’t over yet.

One month after losing its case to block AT&T’s $85 billion merger with Time Warner, the Justice Department filed an appeal Thursday.

In a statement, AT&T’s general counsel, David McAtee, sounded a bit baffled.

“The Court’s decision could hardly have been more thorough, fact-based and well-reasoned,” he stated. “While the losing party in litigation always has the right to appeal if it wishes, we are surprised that the DOJ has chosen to do so under these circumstances.”

McAtee went on to state that AT&T is ready to defend the district court’s decision in the Washington, DC, Circuit Court of Appeals.

Regardless, AT&T’s shares dipped 1% after the bell, though they started creeping back up nearly immediately.

Although the Justice Department’s new filing includes no details, during the trial the government argued that combining the two behemoths – AT&T’s distribution pipes with Time Warner’s premium content – was an antitrust violation that would lead to higher prices for consumers.

AT&T claimed that to attract ad dollars and more effectively compete against massive tech rivals – Netflix, Amazon, Facebook and Google – it needed the opportunity to combine data, entertainment and distribution into a single platform.

The federal judge presiding over the case, Richard Leon, was ultimately unmoved by the government’s argument, deciding unequivocally in AT&T’s favor and deeming the merger legal. There were no conditions imposed on the merger.

In his 172-page opinion on June 12, Leon expressly stated his belief that the government has no “likelihood of success on the merits of an appeal.”

“[The] government here has taken its best shot to block the merger based on the law and the facts and within the time allowed,” Leon wrote. “The defendant did their best to oppose it. The Court has spoken.”

But what does the government’s move mean for the future of vertical mergers if Leon’s blessing of AT&T-Time Warner is revoked? It’s possible there could be a dampening effect, at least in the short term, for other media and cable giants, notably Disney and Comcast, as they battle for more assets of their own.

As Elgin Thompson, managing director of Digital Capital Advisors, noted to AdExchanger in June, after Leon approved the AT&T-Time Warner deal: The “DOJ pushed the pause button on the media M&A market” in November when it first sued AT&T over the telecom’s merger aspirations.

Now it’s trying to do the same again.

Must Read

Don’t Worry About Netflix – It’s Doing Fine Without Warner Bros. Discovery

Paramount might have outlasted and outbid Netflix in the competition to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, but Netflix is not overly fussed about the loss.

Paramount’s Upfront Pitch Is About Three Things

Paramount is merging the ad tech stacks behind Paramount+ and Pluto TV, releasing a new performance product, offering more control over ad placements and introducing dynamic ad insertion in live sports.

Hard Truths For Retail Media At The IAB Connected Commerce Summit

The IAB’s Connected Commerce event in New York City this week felt to me like the retail media industry’s first sit-down explanation to a child who is now a “big kid” and must act accordingly.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Meta Is Launching An Easy Button For CAPI

Meta is simplifying its CAPI setup and teaching its pixel new tricks, including adding an AI-powered feature that automatically pulls in data from an advertiser’s website.

TelevisaUnivision Joins The Streaming Self-Service Bandwagon

TelevisaUnivision is the latest TV publisher to join the self-serve trend that’s rising in popularity across connected TV advertising. Its streaming inventory is now available to buy through fullthrottle.ai’s self-serve platform. The collaboration includes an ad bidder designed to improve both targeting and measurement.

Comic: Gamechanger (Google lost the DOJ's search antitrust case)

For Google Advertisers Who Overpaid The Monopoly – Don’t Hate, Arbitrate

Law firm Keller Postman is leading mass arbitration suits against Google, seeking advertiser damages for alleged monopoly overpricing. The total available pot is a quarter-trillion dollars.