Home Platforms DOJ Appeals AT&T-Time Warner Ruling

DOJ Appeals AT&T-Time Warner Ruling

SHARE:

Hold the phone, it ain’t over yet.

One month after losing its case to block AT&T’s $85 billion merger with Time Warner, the Justice Department filed an appeal Thursday.

In a statement, AT&T’s general counsel, David McAtee, sounded a bit baffled.

“The Court’s decision could hardly have been more thorough, fact-based and well-reasoned,” he stated. “While the losing party in litigation always has the right to appeal if it wishes, we are surprised that the DOJ has chosen to do so under these circumstances.”

McAtee went on to state that AT&T is ready to defend the district court’s decision in the Washington, DC, Circuit Court of Appeals.

Regardless, AT&T’s shares dipped 1% after the bell, though they started creeping back up nearly immediately.

Although the Justice Department’s new filing includes no details, during the trial the government argued that combining the two behemoths – AT&T’s distribution pipes with Time Warner’s premium content – was an antitrust violation that would lead to higher prices for consumers.

AT&T claimed that to attract ad dollars and more effectively compete against massive tech rivals – Netflix, Amazon, Facebook and Google – it needed the opportunity to combine data, entertainment and distribution into a single platform.

The federal judge presiding over the case, Richard Leon, was ultimately unmoved by the government’s argument, deciding unequivocally in AT&T’s favor and deeming the merger legal. There were no conditions imposed on the merger.

In his 172-page opinion on June 12, Leon expressly stated his belief that the government has no “likelihood of success on the merits of an appeal.”

“[The] government here has taken its best shot to block the merger based on the law and the facts and within the time allowed,” Leon wrote. “The defendant did their best to oppose it. The Court has spoken.”

But what does the government’s move mean for the future of vertical mergers if Leon’s blessing of AT&T-Time Warner is revoked? It’s possible there could be a dampening effect, at least in the short term, for other media and cable giants, notably Disney and Comcast, as they battle for more assets of their own.

As Elgin Thompson, managing director of Digital Capital Advisors, noted to AdExchanger in June, after Leon approved the AT&T-Time Warner deal: The “DOJ pushed the pause button on the media M&A market” in November when it first sued AT&T over the telecom’s merger aspirations.

Now it’s trying to do the same again.

Must Read

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Programmatic IO: Insurers Are Building Ad Tech’s AI Accountability Layer

Agencies and marketers discussed the future of AI governance at AdExchanger’s Programmatic IO NYC this week. The main takeaway? Expect insurers to play an increasingly important role in managing AI compliance.

Apple’s Latest Operating System Blocks The Trade Desk From Serving Ads On Safari

The Trade Desk is unable to serve ads to the Safari browser for Apple device owners that have downloaded iOS 27. Apple has been investigating the issue since last week.

Who Will Stand Up For The Open Web?

The open web is done, stick a fork in it. Banner blindness is near universal, search traffic has run dry and publishers are struggling for oxygen. But what if that’s … not true?