Home Online Advertising Rubicon SEC Filing: Chango’s 2014 Revenues Were $43M, But Retargeting Firm Wasn’t Profitable

Rubicon SEC Filing: Chango’s 2014 Revenues Were $43M, But Retargeting Firm Wasn’t Profitable

SHARE:

rubicon-changoChango recorded 2014 revenues of $43 million prior to its acquisition by Rubicon Project, according to a new US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing.

But the company was not profitable, despite being an early player in the lucrative retargeting niche. It reported a loss of just under $1 million for the year. Read the 8-K.

Chango offers website and search retargeting capabilities to a customer list that includes 60 marketers in the Fortune 500. In Q2 it sold to Rubicon for $122 million in cash and stock, representing a roughly 3x multiple on the 2014 revenue figure reported Friday.

The lack of profitability for 7-year-old Chango shows just how tough it can be to make a late-stage ad tech startup succeed at a time when venture capital is hard to come by for firms focused on display ad tech. (Startups focused on TV/video, commerce and mobile appear to be having an easier time, as evidenced by new rounds for firms like ISpot.tv, Purch and Altitude Digital.)

Rubicon’s filing gets to the heart of the challenge for late-stage DSPs and ad networks. Chango’s cost of revenue, including data and media costs, totaled $25 million in 2014, or more than half of total revenue. Meanwhile sales and marketing costs were $13 million, and technology and development costs were $3 million.

If that were all of the company’s expenses, Chango might have squeezed out a slight $1 million profit, but the smallest line item of them all – $3 million worth of general and administrative costs – put the company into the red for the year.

Its acquisition brought Rubicon more firmly into the buy-side arena with offerings geared to the agency and marketer buyer. While Rubicon already had a fully featured demand-side platform, Chango brought considerable customer scale along with about 150 employees to serve those clients.

The deal followed Rubicon’s acquisition of iSocket and ShinyAds, two platforms for deal automation that cost less than $30 million cumulatively. The tiny deal price suggested that the programmatic “orders” business was more nascent than some had thought, but Rubicon is making some progress.

In Q1 2015, CEO Frank Addante said this part of Rubicon’s business was 15% of overall managed revenue, up from 13% in the fourth quarter.

Corrected: An earlier version incorrectly presumed Chango’s numbers were in US currency. Story has been updated. 

Must Read

New WBD Report Makes The Case For Getting The Measurement Basics Right

Warner Bros. Discovery has a new white paper analyzing the data and methodologies of five top video measurement providers: VideoAmp, iSpot, Comscore, Innovid and Samba.

Monopoly Man looks on at the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial (comic).

Google And The DOJ Filed Their Proposed Final Judgments In The Ad Tech Case – Here’s What They’re Still Arguing About

Google and the Department of Justice filed the next round of paperwork that will determine what Google’s punishment will look like in the ad tech antitrust case.

T-Mobile Brings Its Mobile Data Exclusively To Vistar To Scale Up DOOH Targeting

Advertisers can now use Vistar to activate both off-the-shelf and custom audiences built on T-Mobile’s first-party location and app data.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters

Apple Has Far-Reaching Plans To Block Hundreds Of Programmatic Data Companies From iOS

Apple’s WebKit crackdown appears to extend well beyond The Trade Desk, putting hundreds of ad tech, data and identity vendors on a mysterious, dynamically updated block list.

Josh Reed, Zoom's VP of brand and content, speaking at AdExchanger's Programmatic IO event in New York City (September 28, 2006)

Zoom’s Marketing Challenge Is That It’s Too Well Known For Its Own Good

Zoom has 99% unaided brand awareness, which sounds great on paper. But there’s a catch: Most people still think it’s just a video-call app.

Why Agencies Think They Shouldn’t Own Agentic AI Tools Or The Data Used To Build Them

Agencies are differentiating their tech stacks by building custom agentic AI tools for their clients. And they’re rethinking owning those AI tools – particularly since licensing them creates new revenue streams.