Home On TV & Video Why Facebook Boycott Dollars Should Head To CTV

Why Facebook Boycott Dollars Should Head To CTV

SHARE:

Philip Inghelbrecht headshotOn TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Philip Inghelbrecht, co-founder and CEO at Tatari.

Facebook has largely weathered most of its criticism unscathed. Since the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018, Facebook’s user base has ballooned to 2.6 billion monthly actives and the stock price is up another 50%.

This time will most likely be different. Facebook knows that it is at the heart of some of the most toxic and divisive discourse in the country, yet it refuses to do much of real significance about it, further exemplified by Mark Zuckerberg’s initial silence. The dollars that power the Facebook engine and helped it overcome past public outcries have had enough of it. Brands such as Unilever, Levi’s and Coca-Cola have joined the StopHateForProfit pledgewithdrawing from the advertising platform and loudly demanding change.

To the extent that Facebook fails to make amends, brands will increasingly reallocate their dollars to other channels, streaming TV being one of them. In this process, they are likely to learn that connected TV (CTV) and over-the-top (OTT) TV have as much, if not more, to offer than Facebook as many advertisers reach a point of diminishing returns on Facebook.

Large audience: Streaming TV viewers have grown into a sizable and meaningful audience that has become significantly larger during the pandemic. Sixty-one percent of the US population watches connected TV, according to eMarketer; streaming platforms Roku or Pluto each boast 84.7 million users and 24 million viewers, respectively.

While this is only a portion of Facebook’s active user base, it’s still huge, especially considering that they are a captive audience opting into content on a large screen vs. the casual mobile feed scrollers.

Broad demographic. Streaming TV is no longer just a young, cord-cutting or coastal constituency. People from all walks watch streaming TV, and advertisers can find just about any demographic or psychographic they are looking for. This allows marketers to fill the gaps of both the younger audiences on Instagram and older ones found on Facebook.

High targeting: Building on the latter point, the streaming TV audience has become highly targetable. Using either first- or third-party data, TV advertisers can buy their audiences in the most granular manner, either within a publishing platform or going programmatic across publishers (as opposed to buying networks or programs). Campaigns built on look-alike and retargeting are no longer the province of digital alone; they are part of the most basic streaming TV offering. CTV is also competitively scalable, offering a gentler marginal cost curve than Facebook, meaning it takes longer to reach a saturation point.

More brand-safe: By purchasing inventory directly from publishers, advertisers can actually find a platform that is even more brand-safe than Facebook. This is not to be taken lightly, especially considering what has brought us to the departure from Facebook in the first place. This is something YouTube has struggled with too.

Equal measurement: CTV has become as measurable as digital advertising. A campaign is not quantified by impressions delivered but by outcomes such as cost per visitor and cost per acquisition – the same KPIs Facebook initially used to steal linear TV dollars a few years ago.

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

The jump from Facebook to streaming TV is further facilitated by the fact that existing creatives can be used. While the pandemic has challenged the entire ad industry in terms of new video production, most brands likely have 15-second creatives ready that they were already using on Facebook and Instagram from feed or in-stream ad campaigns. These same creatives, which likely were optimized several times over, can easily be used on the big screen.

Established brands finding themselves in a moral pickle are not just eyeing their younger (DTC) peers and competitors that successfully use (streaming) TV as a customer acquisition channel. Chances are they will discover newfound love with streaming TV as a marketing channel­ – not just a summer fling or affair but possibly an engagement that will last well beyond, countering Mark Zuckerberg’s confidence that advertisers will be back on Facebook “soon enough.”

Follow Tatari (@TatariTV) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger) on Twitter.

Must Read

Comic: Alphabet Soup

Buried DOJ Evidence Reveals How Google Dealt With The Trade Desk

In the process of the investigation into Google, the Department of Justice unearthed a vast trove of separate evidence. Some of these findings paint a whole new picture of how Google interacts and competes with its main DSP rival, The Trade Desk.

Comic: The Unified Auction

DOJ vs. Google, Day Four: Behind The Scenes On The Fraught Rollout Of Unified Pricing Rules

On Thursday, the US district court in Alexandria, Virginia boarded a time machine back to April 18, 2019 – the day of a tense meeting between Google and publishers.

Google Ads Will Now Use A Trusted Execution Environment By Default

Confidential matching – which uses a TEE built on Google Cloud infrastructure – will now be the default setting for all uses of advertiser first-party data in Customer Match.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Unraveling The Mystery Of PubMatic’s $5 Million Loss From A “First-Price Auction Switch”

PubMatic’s $5 million loss from DV360’s bidding algorithm fix earlier this year suggests second-price auctions aren’t completely a thing of the past.

A comic version of former News Corp executive Stephanie Layser in the courtroom for the DOJ's ad tech-focused trial against Google in Virginia.

The DOJ vs. Google, Day Two: Tales From The Underbelly Of Ad Tech

Day Two of the Google antitrust trial in Alexandria, Virginia on Tuesday was just as intensely focused on the intricacies of ad tech as on Day One.

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.