Home On TV & Video Local TV Needs Open Standards For Automated Buying And Selling

Local TV Needs Open Standards For Automated Buying And Selling

SHARE:

On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video.

Today’s column is written by Shereta Williams, president at Videa.

Local TV advertisers and broadcasters have heard it time and time again: “Digital’s got it all figured out.”

And then, “Why can’t you be more like digital?”

TV will likely take on some of digital’s attributes, but for now we have a few things to work out: The lack of standardization is holding back the local TV ad industry from fully embracing automation.

TV automation platforms have entered the market, but they are mostly incompatible, leaving agencies and stations unable to transact across multiple systems easily.

The market ​demands ​​a unified buying experience where none exists, so TV stations have no choice but to use manual steps to work across different systems, adding time and complexity. With the amount of technology at our disposal to create interfaces that work across platforms, it doesn’t have to be this complicated.

Unfortunately, the available technology isn’t the problem – the issue is industry buy-in.

Conversations about open standards for automated buying and selling are taking place, largely fueled by a group of local TV broadcasters including Sinclair Broadcast, Tribune Media, Tegna and Nexstar, which joined forces last year to create the TV Interface Practices (TIP) Consortium.

The group aims to develop standards-based interfaces to accelerate automated advertising transactions, enabling local TV broadcasters and their media agency partners to work with any automation platform that adopts these standards. 

Creating standards where none exist

Subscribe

AdExchanger Daily

Get our editors’ roundup delivered to your inbox every weekday.

While eMarketer estimates that more than 80% of display ads are now bought and sold programmatically, only 2.8% of TV advertising is transacted that way.

That offers a mismatch for marketers who have adapted so much of their buying to programmatic and would welcome TV automation. Marketers are also increasingly asking for greater insights to track their campaigns’ performance and more transparency during the buying process.

How open standards can tip the scales

Open standards would help to remove inefficiencies in the current buying and selling process. Local TV stations face workflow challenges in securing the best price for inventory because they need to estimate ratings for future inventory – a manual process that weighs on transaction efficiency.

Instead of buyers and sellers wasting as much as 30% of their time on manual steps, they could put their minds to tackling challenges such as proper attribution and audience targeting through data. Open standards would allow this type of data to surface.

Open standards and interoperability don’t imply assimilation or monopolization, but quite the opposite. APIs would allow all of these different platforms to exist alongside and communicate with each other, rather than putting up silos between competitors and cordoning off achievements. The TIP initiative is also reusing previous file formats and pooling resources to create better workflows and accuracy of information and data. 

The next steps: conversation and collaboration

TIP is making good progress so far. Last November, the group contacted more than a dozen systems providers that offer components of local TV transactions and spot buying. [Disclosure: Videa was among the providers contacted.] The group will use that research to offer a set of APIs to support the electronic transfer of transaction data. The local broadcast TV trade association, TVB, is partnering and acting as a repository for the group’s work.

Despite the progress, there are still difficult conversations to be had. This worthy investment will cost money, and the industry needs to recognize the undeniable value of such an investment before agreeing to fund it.

Open standards are a necessary component in the future of automation in the TV ad industry. With enough cooperation among industry players, instead of constant comparisons to digital, TV will evolve to include the best of both worlds: incredible reach and engagement paired with ease of access and accountability.

Follow Videa (@VideaLLC) and AdExchanger (@adexchanger).

Must Read

A comic depicting Judge Leonie Brinkema's view of the her courtroom where the DOJ vs. Google ad tech antitrust trial is about to begin. (Comic: Court Is In Session)

Your Day One Recap: DOJ vs. Google Goes Deep Into The Ad Tech Weeds

It’s not often one gets to hear sworn witnesses in federal court explain the intricacies of header bidding under oath. But that’s what happened during the first day of the Google ad tech-focused antitrust case in Virginia on Monday.

Comic: What Else? (Google, Jedi Blue, Project Bernanke)

Project Cheat Sheet: A Rundown On All Of Google’s Secret Internal Projects, As Revealed By The DOJ

What do Hercule Poirot, Ben Bernanke, Star Wars and C.S. Lewis have in common? If you’re an ad tech nerd, you’ll know the answer immediately.

shopping cart

The Wonderful Brand Discusses Testing OOH And Online Snack Competition

Wonderful hadn’t done an out-of-home (OOH) marketing push in more than 15 years. That is, until a week ago, when it began a campaign across six major markets to promote its new no-shell pistachio packs.

Privacy! Commerce! Connected TV! Read all about it. Subscribe to AdExchanger Newsletters
Google filed a motion to exclude the testimony of any government witnesses who aren’t economists or antitrust experts during the upcoming ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

Google Is Fighting To Keep Ad Tech Execs Off the Stand In Its Upcoming Antitrust Trial

Google doesn’t want AppNexus founder Brian O’Kelley – you know, the godfather of programmatic – to testify during its ad tech antitrust trial starting on September 9.

How HUMAN Uncovered A Scam Serving 2.5 Billion Ads Per Day To Piracy Sites

Publishers trafficking in pirated movies, TV shows and games sold programmatic ads alongside this stolen content, while using domain cloaking to obscure the “cashout sites” where the ads actually ran.

In 2019, Google moved to a first-price auction and also ceded its last look advantage in AdX, in part because it had to. Most exchanges had already moved to first price.

Thanks To The DOJ, We Now Know What Google Really Thought About Header Bidding

Starting last week and into this week, hundreds of court-filed documents have been unsealed in the lead-up to the Google ad tech antitrust trial – and it’s a bonanza.